OFFICIAL Good spot Laureen and I tripped over the lack of anonymised when presenting to the GAC today but had assumed it was my slide/presentation issue. Becky I think anonymised is better as the returned string/email will be anonymised from the viewpoint of most of the public commenters (as non-controllers) and fits with the rest of the language better. Also the differentiation is better explained in the report rather than making the question long. Thanks Chris From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Becky Burr via Gnso-epdp-team Sent: 15 June 2021 20:59 To: Kapin, Laureen Cc: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the Community - clarification needed do you mean pseudonymized rather than anonymized? On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kapin, Laureen via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>> wrote: In preparing for tomorrow's presentation, I realized that Question 5 to the Community omits an important word, "anonymized." We should correct this. Here is the Question from the Initial Report: EPDP Team Question for Community Input #5 Does this guidance as written provide sufficient information and resources to Registrars and Registry Operators who wish to publish a registrant- or registration-based email address? If not, what is missing and why? Taken literally, this might leave the impression that the Recommendation is to publish a standard email address. In fact, our deliberations involved the publication of an anonymized (or more precisely, pseudonymized) email address. I request that we correct this oversight both so that our intention is clear and so that the public comments solicited focus on the real topic to consider - whether to publish some form of an anonymized email address. I propose that we publish a corrected version of the Initial Report that inserts the word "anonymized" prior to "registrant- or registration-based email address" to correct this oversight. Kind regards, Laureen Kapin Acting Assistant Director Division of Consumer Response and Operations Bureau of Consumer Protection Federal Trade Commission _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. This information is supplied in confidence by the NCA. The NCA is not listed as a Public Authority under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Any information supplied by, or relating to, the NCA is also subject to an absolute exemption. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under data protection legislation. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the NCA FOI single point of contact, by email on StatutoryDisclosureTeam@nca.gov.uk. All email sent and received by the NCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by NCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. Email may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within the NCA, on authority from the Director General or their Deputy for analysis. This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.