For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report
Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently). For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format. As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”. As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
Thank you very much for this work. I guess you mean to mark the concerns by 4th Feb and not March. Here are some of my comments: Line 1542, Rec 12: Reasonable access should be called "parameters for responding to lawful disclosure requests". Why does line 1542 recommends a modified version? Line 1558, Rec 12: It is worrisome that so much leeway and emphasis has been given for the implementation phase to clarify the criteria further. Line 1580, Rec 12: When did we agree that a separate guideline/timeline might be considered for disclosure of personal data in urgent circumstances? I did record my objection to that. Line 1589: EPDP recommends that working on these (disclosure) criteria start as soon as possible. What does that mean? Are we recommending that implementation of disclosure criteria start sooner than anything else? Rec 12 in general: all the "access" language has to be replaced with disclosure requests. Line 1936, Rec 13: Joint Controller Agreement language is removed, providing no rationale. Other than Chris Disspain's point of view and the US government reasoning, as I say I don't see objections to JCA. If you have considered the public comments to make this change, please let us know. If you have considered other factors I would like to know what they are. Line 2066, Rec 18: If we are getting rid of data processing agreement replacing with data protection arrangements (which I don't personally agree with) then please be consistent throughout the document. Or are we only getting rid of DPA and JCA only regarding registries and registrars? Line 2129, Rec21: Data processing agreement/ JCA mentioned for Escrows etc. Are we keeping this language? I will send more comments soon. Farzaneh On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:10 PM Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear EPDP Team,
Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently).
For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by *Monday 4 March COB* so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format.
As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”.
As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. *
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Thank you very much for this work. I guess you mean to mark the concerns by 4th Feb and not March. Here are some of my comments: *Line 1542, Rec 12: Reasonable access should be called "parameters for ". Why does line 1542 recommends a modified version?* Comment from KA We better use the formulation agreed in Toronto in saying " as for the term "*Reasonable access"pending to further actions on the matter the Team proposed to use the term " parameter **responding to lawful disclosure requests" on an interim basis * *Line 1558, Rec 12: It is worrisome that so much leeway and emphasis has been given for the implementation phase to clarify the criteria further.* Comment from KA *On the contrary we need to clearly describe the sequence of action as specified in Recommendation * *Line 1580, Rec 12: When did we agree that a separate guideline/timeline might be considered for disclosure of personal data in urgent circumstances? I did record my objection to that.* Comment from KA We need to verfy what was agreed from Transcrip and record. *Line 1589: EPDP recommends that working on these (disclosure) criteria start as soon as possible. What does that mean? Are we recommending that implementation of disclosure criteria start sooner than anything else? * Comment from KA No. There is not such understanding of the term " as soon as possible " meaning to establish order of priority in dealing several items or taking actions on several items *Rec 12 in general: all the "access" language has to be replaced with disclosure requests. * *Comment from Kavouss * See my comments above in stating for the time being on an interin basis such replacement is being proposed.*NO PERMANENT REPLACE IS ACCEPTABLE * *Line 1936, Rec 13: Joint Controller Agreement language is removed, providing no rationale. Other than Chris Disspain's point of view and the US government reasoning, as I say I don't see objections to JCA. If you have considered the public comments to make this change, please let us know. If you have considered other factors I would like to know what they are. * Comment from Kavouss This requires further debate to remove or retain to JCA *Line 2066, Rec 18: If we are getting rid of data processing agreement replacing with data protection arrangements (which I don't personally agree with) then please be consistent throughout the document. Or are we only getting rid of DPA and JCA only regarding registries and registrars?* Comment from KA I agree with the question raised ? *Line 2129, Rec21: Data processing agreement/ JCA mentioned for Escrows etc. Are we keeping this language?* Comment from KA I also agree with the question raised Kavouss *I will send more comments soon. * On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 9:28 AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you very much for this work. I guess you mean to mark the concerns by 4th Feb and not March.
Here are some of my comments:
Line 1542, Rec 12: Reasonable access should be called "parameters for responding to lawful disclosure requests". Why does line 1542 recommends a modified version?
Line 1558, Rec 12: It is worrisome that so much leeway and emphasis has been given for the implementation phase to clarify the criteria further.
Line 1580, Rec 12: When did we agree that a separate guideline/timeline might be considered for disclosure of personal data in urgent circumstances? I did record my objection to that. Line 1589: EPDP recommends that working on these (disclosure) criteria start as soon as possible. What does that mean? Are we recommending that implementation of disclosure criteria start sooner than anything else?
Rec 12 in general: all the "access" language has to be replaced with disclosure requests.
Line 1936, Rec 13: Joint Controller Agreement language is removed, providing no rationale. Other than Chris Disspain's point of view and the US government reasoning, as I say I don't see objections to JCA. If you have considered the public comments to make this change, please let us know. If you have considered other factors I would like to know what they are.
Line 2066, Rec 18: If we are getting rid of data processing agreement replacing with data protection arrangements (which I don't personally agree with) then please be consistent throughout the document. Or are we only getting rid of DPA and JCA only regarding registries and registrars?
Line 2129, Rec21: Data processing agreement/ JCA mentioned for Escrows etc. Are we keeping this language?
I will send more comments soon.
Farzaneh
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:10 PM Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear EPDP Team,
Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently).
For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by *Monday 4 March COB* so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format.
As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”.
As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. *
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Thanks, Farzaneh, for pointing out the error – substantive issues or concerns that groups want to flag for further discussion, should be shared on the mailing list by Monday 4 FEBRUARY! Best regards, Marika From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Friday, February 1, 2019 at 17:10 To: 'EPDP' <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently). For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format. As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”. As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
I note that the language I proposed on the integration of the ARS into Purpose 6 is not included. When will we discuss this? Alan At 01/02/2019 06:10 PM, Marika Konings wrote: Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently). For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL... . On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format. As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”. As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support � GNSO, Internet Corporration for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. Content-Type: application/pdf; name="EPDP Team Draft Final Report - REDLINE - version 1 February 2019.pdf" Content-Description: EPDP Team Draft Final Report - REDLINE - version 1 February 2019.pdf Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="EPDP Team Draft Final Report - REDLINE - version 1 February" 2019.pdf"; size=2997294; creation-date="Fri, 01 Feb 2019 23:10:12 GMT"; modification-date="Fri, 01 Feb 2019 23:10:13 GMT" Content-ID: <B9D117065EEB9B4695A1EFA5CBD4C29B@pexch112.icann.org> _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
I think this is a non-substantive suggestion and also one that I hope will be supported by the group. Appendix B lists members and alternates but nowhere in the document do I see any reference to its authors or our wonderful staff support. It’s my understanding and experience that typically that information is included. Either way I would like to see our staff support team get credit for their efforts and contributions and request that they be added to Appendix B of the final report. Best, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 6:10 PM To: 'EPDP' <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently). For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format. As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”. As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
I fully support that GREAT and much deserved suggestion. Diane Plaut General Counsel and Privacy Officer [cid:image001.png@01D3CA70.18FC1D40] Direct +1 646-899-2806 diane.plaut@corsearch.com<mailto:diane.plaut@corsearch.com> 220 West 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United States www.corsearch.com<http://www.corsearch.com/> Join Corsearch on Twitter<https://twitter.com/corsearch> Linkedin<https://www.linkedin.com/company/2593860/> Trademarks + Brands<http://trademarksandbrands.corsearch.com/> Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241) Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com<mailto:Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com> Confidentiality Notice: This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession. From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Reply-To: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson@verisign.com> Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 10:02 PM To: "marika.konings@icann.org" <marika.konings@icann.org>, "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report I think this is a non-substantive suggestion and also one that I hope will be supported by the group. Appendix B lists members and alternates but nowhere in the document do I see any reference to its authors or our wonderful staff support. It’s my understanding and experience that typically that information is included. Either way I would like to see our staff support team get credit for their efforts and contributions and request that they be added to Appendix B of the final report. Best, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 6:10 PM To: 'EPDP' <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently). For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL8jw/edit?ts=5c4f07ef<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL8jw/edit?ts=5c4f07ef>. On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg<https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg>), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format. As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”. As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
100% on board with this one On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 03:33, Plaut, Diane <Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com> wrote:
I fully support that GREAT and much deserved suggestion.
*Diane Plaut*
General Counsel and Privacy Officer
[image: cid:image001.png@01D3CA70.18FC1D40]
Direct +1 646-899-2806 diane.plaut@corsearch.com
220 West 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United States www.corsearch.com
Join Corsearch on Twitter <https://twitter.com/corsearch> Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2593860/> Trademarks + Brands <http://trademarksandbrands.corsearch.com/>
Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241) Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com
*Confidentiality Notice:* This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession.
*From: *Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> *Reply-To: *"Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson@verisign.com> *Date: *Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 10:02 PM *To: *"marika.konings@icann.org" <marika.konings@icann.org>, " gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report
I think this is a non-substantive suggestion and also one that I hope will be supported by the group.
Appendix B lists members and alternates but nowhere in the document do I see any reference to its authors or our wonderful staff support. It’s my understanding and experience that typically that information is included. Either way I would like to see our staff support team get credit for their efforts and contributions and request that they be added to Appendix B of the final report.
Best, Marc
*From:* Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings *Sent:* Friday, February 01, 2019 6:10 PM *To:* 'EPDP' <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report
Dear EPDP Team,
Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently).
For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by *Monday 4 March COB* so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format.
As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”.
As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. *
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-- Emily Taylor CEO, Oxford Information Labs *MA (Cantab), Solicitor (non-practising), MBA, * *A**ssociate Fellow, Chatham House; Editor, Journal of Cyber Policy* Lincoln House, Pony Road, Oxford OX4 2RD | T: 01865 582885 E: emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk | D: 01865 582811 | M: +44 7540 049322 <http://explore.tandfonline.com/cfp/pgas/rcyb-cfp-2017> <http://explore.tandfonline.com/cfp/pgas/rcyb-cfp-2017> Registered office: Lincoln House, 4 Pony Road, Oxford OX4 2RD. Registered in England and Wales No. 4520925. VAT No. 799526263 .
+1 Marc ________________________________ From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk> Sent: 07 February 2019 10:36 To: Plaut, Diane Cc: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report 100% on board with this one On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 03:33, Plaut, Diane <Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com<mailto:Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com>> wrote: I fully support that GREAT and much deserved suggestion. Diane Plaut General Counsel and Privacy Officer [cid:image001.png@01D3CA70.18FC1D40] Direct +1 646-899-2806 diane.plaut@corsearch.com<mailto:diane.plaut@corsearch.com> 220 West 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United Stateswww.corsearch.com<http://www.corsearch.com/> Join Corsearch on Twitter<https://twitter.com/corsearch> Linkedin<https://www.linkedin.com/company/2593860/> Trademarks + Brands<http://trademarksandbrands.corsearch.com/> Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241)Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com<mailto:Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com> Confidentiality Notice: This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession. From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>> Reply-To: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson@verisign.com<mailto:mcanderson@verisign.com>> Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 10:02 PM To: "marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>" <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>>, "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report I think this is a non-substantive suggestion and also one that I hope will be supported by the group. Appendix B lists members and alternates but nowhere in the document do I see any reference to its authors or our wonderful staff support. It’s my understanding and experience that typically that information is included. Either way I would like to see our staff support team get credit for their efforts and contributions and request that they be added to Appendix B of the final report. Best, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 6:10 PM To: 'EPDP' <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently). For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format. As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”. As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team -- Emily Taylor CEO, Oxford Information Labs MA (Cantab), Solicitor (non-practising), MBA, Associate Fellow, Chatham House; Editor, Journal of Cyber Policy Lincoln House, Pony Road, Oxford OX4 2RD | T: 01865 582885 E: emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor@oxil.co.uk> | D: 01865 582811 | M: +44 7540 049322 [https://drive.google.com/a/oxil.co.uk/uc?id=1-3eDLYPfLpkj30Jc34NcbkD1xt8NQpU8&export=download]<http://explore.tandfonline.com/cfp/pgas/rcyb-cfp-2017>[https://docs.google.com/a/oxil.co.uk/uc?id=0B7sS_6djDxsHNm92d21jM21HMDQ&export=download]<http://explore.tandfonline.com/cfp/pgas/rcyb-cfp-2017> Registered office: Lincoln House, 4 Pony Road, Oxford OX4 2RD. Registered in England and Wales No. 4520925. VAT No. 799526263 .
+1 to this addition to Appendix B Ayden ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, February 6, 2019 10:33 PM, Plaut, Diane <Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com> wrote:
I fully support that GREAT and much deserved suggestion.
Diane Plaut
General Counsel and Privacy Officer
[cid:image001.png@01D3CA70.18FC1D40]
Direct +1 646-899-2806 diane.plaut@corsearch.com
220 West 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United States [www.corsearch.com](http://www.corsearch.com/)
Join Corsearch on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/corsearch) [Linkedin](https://www.linkedin.com/company/2593860/) [Trademarks + Brands](http://trademarksandbrands.corsearch.com/)
Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241) Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com
Confidentiality Notice: This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession.
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Reply-To: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson@verisign.com> Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 10:02 PM To: "marika.konings@icann.org" <marika.konings@icann.org>, "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report
I think this is a non-substantive suggestion and also one that I hope will be supported by the group.
Appendix B lists members and alternates but nowhere in the document do I see any reference to its authors or our wonderful staff support. It’s my understanding and experience that typically that information is included. Either way I would like to see our staff support team get credit for their efforts and contributions and request that they be added to Appendix B of the final report.
Best, Marc
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 6:10 PM To: 'EPDP' <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report
Dear EPDP Team,
Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently).
For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format.
As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”.
As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our [interactive courses](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...) and visiting the [GNSO Newcomer pages](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...).
+100. This has been a Herculean task. Stephanie Perrin On 2019-02-06 22:02, Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team wrote: I think this is a non-substantive suggestion and also one that I hope will be supported by the group. Appendix B lists members and alternates but nowhere in the document do I see any reference to its authors or our wonderful staff support. It’s my understanding and experience that typically that information is included. Either way I would like to see our staff support team get credit for their efforts and contributions and request that they be added to Appendix B of the final report. Best, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org><mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 6:10 PM To: 'EPDP' <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org><mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - latest version of EPDP Team Final Report Dear EPDP Team, Please find attached for your review the latest version of the Final Report. In relation to section 5, EPDP Team Responses to Charter Questions & Recommendations, please note that those sections highlighted in green are considered finalized for inclusion in the Final Report, sections in blue are still under review / consideration (but these do include the latest language, unless indicated differently). For substantive issues or concerns, please flag these on the mailing list by Monday 4 March COB so that these can be included in the meeting agendas for next week. If you want to reference specific parts of the report, please use the line numbering of the attached pdf version. For any minor edits / updates, please use the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sVZ9odV0qK1Bk8a4bDwWe5RW_PBzOnYBhHW_GnLL.... On the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/VZwWBg), we have also posted a Word and clean version for those of you that prefer that format. As you review the Final Report, we want to remind you of Kurt’s message that also seem to apply here: “study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice”. As a reminder, revisions to the data elements workbooks to ensure alignment with EPDP recommendations are being undertaken by a small team which is expected to share the results of its work shortly. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
participants (10)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Anderson, Marc -
Ayden Férdeline -
Emily Taylor -
farzaneh badii -
Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Marika Konings -
Plaut, Diane -
Stephanie Perrin