Proposed modified language for Preliminary Recommendation #2
Dear EPDP Team, As discussed during today’s meeting, please find below the proposed rewording for Preliminary Recommendation #2. As noted, the first part reflects language that has been taken verbatim from the EPDP Team’s charter. The last sentence hopefully reflects today’s discussion and is something that most of you willing to live with for the purpose of the Initial Report. Preliminary Recommendation #2 Per the EPDP Team Charter, the EPDP Team is committed to considering a system for Standardized Access to non-public Registration Data once the gating questions in the charter have been answered. This will include addressing questions such as: * What are the legitimate purposes for third parties to access registration data? * What are the eligibility criteria for access to non-public Registration data? * Do those parties/groups consist of different types of third-party requestors? * What data elements should each user/party have access to? In this context, amongst others, disclosure in the course of intellectual property infringement and DNS abuse cases will be considered. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
I can live with this Preliminary Recommendation #2 Per the EPDP Team Charter, the EPDP Team is committed to considering a system for Standardized Access to non-public Registration Data once the gating questions in the charter have been answered. This will include addressing questions such as: * What are the legitimate purposes for third parties to access registration data? * What are the eligibility criteria for access to non-public Registration data? * Do those parties/groups consist of different types of third-party requestors? * What data elements should each user/party have access to? In this context, amongst others, disclosure in the course of intellectual property infringement and DNS abuse cases will be considered. Best regards,
participants (2)
-
Marika Konings -
Mueller, Milton L