EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
As noted in the call, and in keeping with the charter, NCSG will refrain from addressing any access issues until the gating questions have been answered by consensus. We urge other stakeholder groups and ACs to do the same. We regret that the staff has disregarded the charter and has continued with what Berry and Kurt admitted was “a mistake.” Dr. Milton L Mueller Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology [igp email logo]<http://internetgovernance.org/> From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: 1. Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 2. Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS 3. Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 4. Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
Milton, please note that per the discussion during yesterday’s meeting, the question specific to the Annex was removed from Part 4 of the survey. Instead, a comment box was added that allows those that want to provide further input, including on the annex to do so, but per the charter, any deliberations on the topics outlined in the annex will only commence after the gating questions have been answered. As such, any input provided in relation the annex will be parked until the moment that the gating questions have been addressed. I hope that addresses your concern. Best regards, Marika From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu> Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 10:33 To: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>, "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys As noted in the call, and in keeping with the charter, NCSG will refrain from addressing any access issues until the gating questions have been answered by consensus. We urge other stakeholder groups and ACs to do the same. We regret that the staff has disregarded the charter and has continued with what Berry and Kurt admitted was “a mistake.” Dr. Milton L Mueller Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology [igp email logo]<http://internetgovernance.org/> From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: 1. Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 2. Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS 3. Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 4. Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
Dear All I understand the position taken by NCSG in regard with the sequence of actions to be taken relating to unified access model. However, any Constituency / SO /AC is free to decide on it’s own position according to its internal discussion on any matter No SO/AC should URGE other SO/AC in any issue including this matter Nonetheless, they may be requested or invited by any other SO/AC to consider the position taken by NCSG but NOT be URGED to do any thing There is a need to maintain the principle of Mutual Respect as no one could urge others to do any thing or impose its views /position to others . Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Aug 2018, at 10:32, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:
As noted in the call, and in keeping with the charter, NCSG will refrain from addressing any access issues until the gating questions have been answered by consensus. We urge other stakeholder groups and ACs to do the same. We regret that the staff has disregarded the charter and has continued with what Berry and Kurt admitted was “a mistake.”
Dr. Milton L Mueller Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology <image001.jpg>
From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All:
In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below:
Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79
Thank you.
Best regards,
Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Hello Everyone: I must admit it is difficult, absent face-to-face communication and the intuition that can be drawn from that, to determine when additional communication on an issue is needed. Here is my position on the scope of the triage phase of our project and whether or not each group should comment on the “Access” issue. The Charter states that the: "The first deliverable of the EPDP Team shall be a triage document of the Temporary Specification, which includes items that have the Full Consensus support of the EPDP Team that these should be adopted as is (with no further discussion or modifications needed). These items need to be: In the body of the Temporary Specification (not in the Annex)…” See, https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/temp-spec-... <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/temp-spec-gtld-rd-epdp-19jul18-en.pdf>, pg 10, top. “Not in the Annex,” makes it clear that we will not discuss the Annex during the triage. From this it logically flows that we would not provide content concerning the Annex. To do so would imply / impose an obligation on others to read and consider it during a time when we are moving with all due alacrity to complete the triage. While there is an opportunity to write about the annex in the last comment section of the last bit of our triage discussion (a “blank” comment section if you will), comments entered there will not be discussed until an appropriate time. Those following the direction of the Charter and omitting discussion regarding “access” will not be prejudiced in any way as sufficient time will be made available to contribute to the discussion. I hope this is helpful. Best regards, Kurt
On Aug 2, 2018, at 2:25 AM, Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All I understand the position taken by NCSG in regard with the sequence of actions to be taken relating to unified access model. However, any Constituency / SO /AC is free to decide on it’s own position according to its internal discussion on any matter No SO/AC should URGE other SO/AC in any issue including this matter Nonetheless, they may be requested or invited by any other SO/AC to consider the position taken by NCSG but NOT be URGED to do any thing There is a need to maintain the principle of Mutual Respect as no one could urge others to do any thing or impose its views /position to others . Regards Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Aug 2018, at 10:32, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu <mailto:milton@gatech.edu>> wrote:
As noted in the call, and in keeping with the charter, NCSG will refrain from addressing any access issues until the gating questions have been answered by consensus. We urge other stakeholder groups and ACs to do the same. We regret that the staff has disregarded the charter and has continued with what Berry and Kurt admitted was “a mistake.”
Dr. Milton L Mueller Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology <image001.jpg> <http://internetgovernance.org/>
<> From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All:
In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below:
Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8> Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS> Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7> Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79>
Thank you.
Best regards,
Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team>_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team>
Thanks, Kurt. This sounds right. --MM From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:kurt@kjpritz.com] Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 10:32 PM To: Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org; Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Hello Everyone: I must admit it is difficult, absent face-to-face communication and the intuition that can be drawn from that, to determine when additional communication on an issue is needed. Here is my position on the scope of the triage phase of our project and whether or not each group should comment on the “Access” issue. The Charter states that the: "The first deliverable of the EPDP Team shall be a triage document of the Temporary Specification, which includes items that have the Full Consensus support of the EPDP Team that these should be adopted as is (with no further discussion or modifications needed). These items need to be: * In the body of the Temporary Specification (not in the Annex)…” See, https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/temp-spec-..., pg 10, top. “Not in the Annex,” makes it clear that we will not discuss the Annex during the triage. From this it logically flows that we would not provide content concerning the Annex. To do so would imply / impose an obligation on others to read and consider it during a time when we are moving with all due alacrity to complete the triage. While there is an opportunity to write about the annex in the last comment section of the last bit of our triage discussion (a “blank” comment section if you will), comments entered there will not be discussed until an appropriate time. Those following the direction of the Charter and omitting discussion regarding “access” will not be prejudiced in any way as sufficient time will be made available to contribute to the discussion. I hope this is helpful. Best regards, Kurt On Aug 2, 2018, at 2:25 AM, Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear All I understand the position taken by NCSG in regard with the sequence of actions to be taken relating to unified access model. However, any Constituency / SO /AC is free to decide on it’s own position according to its internal discussion on any matter No SO/AC should URGE other SO/AC in any issue including this matter Nonetheless, they may be requested or invited by any other SO/AC to consider the position taken by NCSG but NOT be URGED to do any thing There is a need to maintain the principle of Mutual Respect as no one could urge others to do any thing or impose its views /position to others . Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone On 2 Aug 2018, at 10:32, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu<mailto:milton@gatech.edu>> wrote: As noted in the call, and in keeping with the charter, NCSG will refrain from addressing any access issues until the gating questions have been answered by consensus. We urge other stakeholder groups and ACs to do the same. We regret that the staff has disregarded the charter and has continued with what Berry and Kurt admitted was “a mistake.” Dr. Milton L Mueller Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology <image001.jpg><http://internetgovernance.org/> From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: 1. Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 2. Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS 3. Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 4. Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Hi, Thank you, Caitlin. Would it be possible to receive the surveys in Word format? Having them in Word will allow us to distribute the questions for input without having one of our respective SG, C, AC or SO members inadvertently complete the survey while intending merely to provide input. Many thanks! Kristina From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: 1. Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 2. Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS 3. Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 4. Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
All, I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses? Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday. Is this intentional? Thank you, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: 1. Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 2. Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS 3. Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 4. Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
Hi Marc: Well, I missed this email - but better late than never. I agree with your point on the timing of the feedback and mentioned the concern during the call on Wednesday. Let’s have the call on Monday and see the quality of responses, monitor the time needed for discussion, and check on people’s experiences in developing the feedback. We will come to the meeting with a suggested plan B and, depending on the outcome of the three points above, adopt plan B or some other modification. Thanks for bringing this up. Kurt
On Aug 3, 2018, at 9:19 AM, Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> wrote:
All,
I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?
Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday. Is this intentional?
Thank you, Marc
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All:
In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below:
Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8> Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS> Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7> Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79>
Thank you.
Best regards,
Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Hi Julf, In an [earlier email](https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/2018-August/000067.html), Kurt wrote, “It would be terrific if submissions are made by Monday 19:00UTC. That is noon in LA, 3PM in DC and 9PM in Brussels and will give us a few hours to assemble the inputs in coherent fashion.” So I think Kurt was suggesting that the decision on how to proceed will be made on Monday [via email], based upon the level and detail of input received? Best wishes, Ayden
On 4 Aug 2018, at 07:40, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
Kurt,
Let’s have the call on Monday and see the quality of responses, monitor the time needed for discussion, and check on people’s experiences in developing the feedback.
What call is this? The next WG call I have in my agenda is on Tuesday.
Julf _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Hi Juff: Good catch. (I meant to type Tuesday but sometimes my mind goes on to the next thing and assigns my fingers to finish the last thought on their own.) Our next call is set for Tuesday at 13:00UTC. Ayden: Thanks for trying to save me but it was a stretch. Kurt
On Aug 3, 2018, at 10:59 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
Hi Julf,
In an earlier email <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/2018-August/000067.html>, Kurt wrote, “It would be terrific if submissions are made by Monday 19:00UTC. That is noon in LA, 3PM in DC and 9PM in Brussels and will give us a few hours to assemble the inputs in coherent fashion.”
So I think Kurt was suggesting that the decision on how to proceed will be made on Monday [via email], based upon the level and detail of input received?
Best wishes,
Ayden
On 4 Aug 2018, at 07:40, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com <mailto:julf@julf.com>> wrote:
Kurt,
Let’s have the call on Monday and see the quality of responses, monitor the time needed for discussion, and check on people’s experiences in developing the feedback.
What call is this? The next WG call I have in my agenda is on Tuesday.
Julf _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
I want to support and second what Marc says here about timing. Now that we know how long it took us to respond to Survey 1, it’s very clear that we will not be able to respond properly to Survey 2 by the scheduled time. We will need to re-set those dates on our next call. Dr. Milton L. Mueller Professor, School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology NCSG From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 12:19 PM To: caitlin.tubergen@icann.org; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys All, I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses? Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday. Is this intentional? Thank you, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: 1. Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 2. Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS 3. Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 4. Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
Dear All Could someone , Marc or Milton attach Marc comment that was supported . Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Aug 2018, at 09:29, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:
I want to support and second what Marc says here about timing. Now that we know how long it took us to respond to Survey 1, it’s very clear that we will not be able to respond properly to Survey 2 by the scheduled time. We will need to re-set those dates on our next call.
Dr. Milton L. Mueller Professor, School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology NCSG
From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 12:19 PM To: caitlin.tubergen@icann.org; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
All,
I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?
Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday. Is this intentional?
Thank you, Marc
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All:
In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below:
Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79
Thank you.
Best regards,
Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Kavouss, I believe Milton is supporting the comment from Marc that appears further down in the email thread: “I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?” Best regards, Marika From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 11:27 To: "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu> Cc: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All Could someone , Marc or Milton attach Marc comment that was supported . Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone On 7 Aug 2018, at 09:29, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu<mailto:milton@gatech.edu>> wrote: I want to support and second what Marc says here about timing. Now that we know how long it took us to respond to Survey 1, it’s very clear that we will not be able to respond properly to Survey 2 by the scheduled time. We will need to re-set those dates on our next call. Dr. Milton L. Mueller Professor, School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology NCSG From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 12:19 PM To: caitlin.tubergen@icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys All, I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses? Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday. Is this intentional? Thank you, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys Dear All: In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below: 1. Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 2. Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS 3. Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 4. Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 Thank you. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
I had suggested at the last meeting, that we review in a meeting only the work of the preceding week's meeting (i.e. Tuesday to Tuesday, Thursday to Thursday. It should be easy enough to divide the topics between the days evenly. I would just like to offer that again....and agree with Marc and Milton. Stephanie On 2018-08-07 11:56, Marika Konings wrote:
Kavouss, I believe Milton is supporting the comment from Marc that appears further down in the email thread:
“I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?”
Best regards,
Marika
*From: *Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> *Date: *Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 11:27 *To: *"Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu> *Cc: *"gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All
Could someone , Marc or Milton attach Marc comment that was supported .
Regards
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Aug 2018, at 09:29, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu <mailto:milton@gatech.edu>> wrote:
I want to support and second what Marc says here about timing. Now that we know how long it took us to respond to Survey 1, it’s very clear that we will not be able to respond properly to Survey 2 by the scheduled time. We will need to re-set those dates on our next call.
Dr. Milton L. Mueller
Professor, School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology
NCSG
*From:*Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team *Sent:* Friday, August 3, 2018 12:19 PM *To:* caitlin.tubergen@icann.org <mailto:caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
All,
I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?
Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday. Is this intentional?
Thank you, Marc
*From:*Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>> *On Behalf Of *Caitlin Tubergen *Sent:* Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM *To:* gnso-epdp-team@icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All:
In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below:
1. *Part 1*, due *Monday, 6 August 2018* by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8> 2. *Part 2*, due *Wednesday, 8 August* by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS> 3. *Part 3*, due *Monday, 13 August* 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7> 4. *Part 4*, due *Sunday, 19 August* 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79>
Thank you.
Best regards,
Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Dear All I also agree with Marc’s Comment I fact have already notified Kurt of the problem arising from a very short interval between the 2nd and 3rd meetings I hope he would favourable acknowledge the difficulty and modify the deadline accordingly Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Aug 2018, at 11:56, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Kavouss, I believe Milton is supporting the comment from Marc that appears further down in the email thread:
“I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?”
Best regards,
Marika
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 11:27 To: "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu> Cc: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All Could someone , Marc or Milton attach Marc comment that was supported . Regards Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Aug 2018, at 09:29, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:
I want to support and second what Marc says here about timing. Now that we know how long it took us to respond to Survey 1, it’s very clear that we will not be able to respond properly to Survey 2 by the scheduled time. We will need to re-set those dates on our next call.
Dr. Milton L. Mueller Professor, School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology NCSG
From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 12:19 PM To: caitlin.tubergen@icann.org; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
All,
I have some questions on the timing of the surveys. Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight. Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent. If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?
Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday. Is this intentional?
Thank you, Marc
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys
Dear All:
In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below:
Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8 Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7 Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79
Thank you.
Best regards,
Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
participants (10)
-
Anderson, Marc -
Arasteh -
Ayden Férdeline -
Caitlin Tubergen -
Johan Helsingius -
Kurt Pritz -
Marika Konings -
Mueller, Milton L -
Rosette, Kristina -
Stephanie Perrin