Review of input received on recommendations & Proposed Agenda for EPDP Team meeting #63 (Thursday 11 June)
Dear EPDP Team, First of all, thank you all for your careful review and constructive input on the Final Report recommendations. The Staff Support Team has gone through all your input and, in consultation with leadership, created a review template for each recommendation in which we have documented how it is proposed that your input is dealt with (see https://community.icann.org/x/K4LsBw). In many cases, it has been proposed that changes are applied where these do not appear to result in substantive changes, but instead add further clarity and specificity to the recommendations. In a number of cases, further guidance is needed from the EPDP Team to determine if / what changes need to be made, and in a limited number of cases it is suggested that no change is warranted because either the concern has already been addressed elsewhere or it concers an issue which was extensively discussed and where no new information has been provided that is likely to change the views of others. In certain cases we made assumptions based on the EPDP Team’s deliberations to respond to clarifying questions. Of course, there may be instances where we got this wrong and as a result, the ask is for each group to review the templates and indicate in the table at the top, the proposed actions / responses that have resulted in a ‘cannot live’ with item for your respective group. As you identify these, we do ask you to provide specific suggestions for alternative language that would address your concern (as well as the original concern raised). Note, there are also a couple of items where we have asked groups to provide some further detail in relation to their concern / proposed change to determine how to best address it. You are strongly encouraged to review the input review templates together with the draft Final Report<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/132940331/EPDP%20Phase%202%...> in which we have applied the proposed changes in redline format so that it is easier to see changes in context. Do note that there is a significant amount of redline, but this is also partly the result of moving things around and removing duplication. The deadline for flagging items that need further discussion (in addition to those already flagged) is Monday 15 June. During the next EPDP Team meeting (Thursday 11 June – see agenda below), we plan to go into a little bit more detail and answer any questions you may have. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #63 Proposed Agenda Thursday 11 June 2020 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) 1. Status of small team deliberations on recommendation #19 (mechanism for SSAD evolution) 4. Proposed approach for reviewing and addressing input received on recommendations (15 min) 1. Overview of recommendations review template<https://community.icann.org/x/K4LsBw> (Staff Support Team) 2. EPDP Team feedback 3. Confirm homework assignment for EPDP Team 4. Confirm next steps 5. Recommendation #2 Accreditation of governmental entities (20 min) 1. Review items flagged for EPDP Team Guidance<https://docs.google.com/document/d/127RbEGY3hlClG6vUG-i5H77LmfOXR9E5/edit> 2. Confirm next steps 6. Proposed approach for dealing with priority 2 items (15 min) 1. Overview of feedback received and leadership recommendation 2. EPDP Team feedback 3. Confirm next steps 7. Final Report preparation (10 min) 1. Overview of status of Final Report<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/132940331/EPDP%20Phase%202%...> 2. Flag open questions not related to recommendations 3. Confirm next steps 8. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): 1. Tuesday 16 June at 14.00 UTC. Topics to be addressed: items flagged for EPDP Team guidance. 2. Confirm action items 1. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any
Marika and staff, as always thank you for all the hard work and support you’ve provided on this. I want to make sure I understand what is in the redline proposed final report (https://community.icann.org/display/EOTSFGRD/g.+Draft+Final+Report+-+Phase+2...). The baseline for this document is the initial report? It then incorporates as redlines all the changes in the proposed final recommendations the working group did it’s can’t live with review against, and then on top of that it also incorporates the staff proposal for how to address can’t live with items except in cases staff felt additional discussion, agreement or clarification was needed? Thanks, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 4:07 AM To: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] Review of input received on recommendations & Proposed Agenda for EPDP Team meeting #63 (Thursday 11 June) Dear EPDP Team, First of all, thank you all for your careful review and constructive input on the Final Report recommendations. The Staff Support Team has gone through all your input and, in consultation with leadership, created a review template for each recommendation in which we have documented how it is proposed that your input is dealt with (see https://community.icann.org/x/K4LsBw<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1fzP5oJmbHDVODsEJeFkp5h2kgiBfeNAwtOpb_TuMzJW5X8PoytIXCHSq5pn0MsjW2wLJyirkSCbAR1HbJxh4-Qy_GxaoeKvj5oxruMo47GRMtcWEphc1NjUzwS3gmeQrtBIkfDDGkNxCqc5ozRcnixLGr_mlWlaj6Fw35StZS2so-j_MXBmnmk2LJCDMt7z_zZoRVizg6QClmQSm1dm8qlquFqkONj05rvySZAelbXs2teobcoiTq_jpCrklfUfDvVXHI7t3l9cQMT4pO4Wpbg/https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.icann.org%2Fx%2FK4LsBw>). In many cases, it has been proposed that changes are applied where these do not appear to result in substantive changes, but instead add further clarity and specificity to the recommendations. In a number of cases, further guidance is needed from the EPDP Team to determine if / what changes need to be made, and in a limited number of cases it is suggested that no change is warranted because either the concern has already been addressed elsewhere or it concers an issue which was extensively discussed and where no new information has been provided that is likely to change the views of others. In certain cases we made assumptions based on the EPDP Team’s deliberations to respond to clarifying questions. Of course, there may be instances where we got this wrong and as a result, the ask is for each group to review the templates and indicate in the table at the top, the proposed actions / responses that have resulted in a ‘cannot live’ with item for your respective group. As you identify these, we do ask you to provide specific suggestions for alternative language that would address your concern (as well as the original concern raised). Note, there are also a couple of items where we have asked groups to provide some further detail in relation to their concern / proposed change to determine how to best address it. You are strongly encouraged to review the input review templates together with the draft Final Report<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1GK02GaqwRhVuB_Dz5sfidRKZ4x16sGqoJR-nlshpyJAkmh...> in which we have applied the proposed changes in redline format so that it is easier to see changes in context. Do note that there is a significant amount of redline, but this is also partly the result of moving things around and removing duplication. The deadline for flagging items that need further discussion (in addition to those already flagged) is Monday 15 June. During the next EPDP Team meeting (Thursday 11 June – see agenda below), we plan to go into a little bit more detail and answer any questions you may have. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #63 Proposed Agenda Thursday 11 June 2020 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a. Status of small team deliberations on recommendation #19 (mechanism for SSAD evolution) 4. Proposed approach for reviewing and addressing input received on recommendations (15 min) a. Overview of recommendations review template<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1fzP5oJmbHDVODsEJeFkp5h2kgiBfeNAwtOpb_TuMzJW5X8...> (Staff Support Team) b. EPDP Team feedback c. Confirm homework assignment for EPDP Team d. Confirm next steps 5. Recommendation #2 Accreditation of governmental entities (20 min) a. Review items flagged for EPDP Team Guidance<https://docs.google.com/document/d/127RbEGY3hlClG6vUG-i5H77LmfOXR9E5/edit> b. Confirm next steps 6. Proposed approach for dealing with priority 2 items (15 min) a. Overview of feedback received and leadership recommendation b. EPDP Team feedback c. Confirm next steps 7. Final Report preparation (10 min) a. Overview of status of Final Report<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1GK02GaqwRhVuB_Dz5sfidRKZ4x16sGqoJR-nlshpyJAkmh...> b. Flag open questions not related to recommendations c. Confirm next steps 8. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): a. Tuesday 16 June at 14.00 UTC. Topics to be addressed: items flagged for EPDP Team guidance. b. Confirm action items a. Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any
participants (2)
-
Anderson, Marc -
Marika Konings