There are sufficient competing redline versions that I will not contribute another. We support the edits recently proposed by the GAC. However, I wish to make it clear that in the view of the ALAC, the end-point must be that the WHOIS/RDS record distinguish between natural and legal persons. It is fine to defer the implementation plan, but that plan must end with all every gTLD record be flagged as to whether the registrant is a legal or natural person. It is appreciated that this cannot happen overnight, but at worst, the implementation must set a hard deadline, preferably no later than the next registration renewal. Alan
Thanks Alan for the perspective...may I ask what you envision would happen if a registrant of an existing domain name does not provide information about whether they are a natural or legal person by the “hard deadline” you describe below? Would the domain name then be revoked? Would the registrar be expected to make that determination in the absence of a response from the registrant? Thank you for the clarification. Regards, Matt
On Nov 2, 2018, at 8:13 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
There are sufficient competing redline versions that I will not contribute another. We support the edits recently proposed by the GAC.
However, I wish to make it clear that in the view of the ALAC, the end-point must be that the WHOIS/RDS record distinguish between natural and legal persons. It is fine to defer the implementation plan, but that plan must end with all every gTLD record be flagged as to whether the registrant is a legal or natural person. It is appreciated that this cannot happen overnight, but at worst, the implementation must set a hard deadline, preferably no later than the next registration renewal.
Alan
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Dear Matt Dear All In principle before the renewal the registrant must clearly indicate within the deadline whether the nature of registration is in natural or legal otherwise revocation is one possible option with A reminder thereto before revocation happens Regards Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 3 Nov 2018, at 03:22, Matt Serlin <matt@brandsight.com> wrote:
Thanks Alan for the perspective...may I ask what you envision would happen if a registrant of an existing domain name does not provide information about whether they are a natural or legal person by the “hard deadline” you describe below? Would the domain name then be revoked? Would the registrar be expected to make that determination in the absence of a response from the registrant?
Thank you for the clarification.
Regards, Matt
On Nov 2, 2018, at 8:13 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
There are sufficient competing redline versions that I will not contribute another. We support the edits recently proposed by the GAC.
However, I wish to make it clear that in the view of the ALAC, the end-point must be that the WHOIS/RDS record distinguish between natural and legal persons. It is fine to defer the implementation plan, but that plan must end with all every gTLD record be flagged as to whether the registrant is a legal or natural person. It is appreciated that this cannot happen overnight, but at worst, the implementation must set a hard deadline, preferably no later than the next registration renewal.
Alan
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
participants (3)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Arasteh -
Matt Serlin