Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Fwd: Responses to EPDP Questions
Farzaneh, I find this comparison offensive. Any access to personal information of domain name registrants will need to be compliant with data protection laws. You may not agree with others on where the balance point is, but presuming that any collection or access (which will implicitly be limited to those with specific needs) will be unlawful is incorrect. Alan At 09/10/2018 03:05 AM, farzaneh badii wrote:
Only some groups' priority is to have access to personal information of domain name registrants. Other groups priorities are: protecting registrants personal information and compliance with data protection laws!
I did not even remotely imply that Alan. Don't know where you got that impression. I am actually for coming up with legal access but access is not the only thing ICANN org should look at and be worried about. On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:23 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Farzaneh, I find this comparison offensive.
Any access to personal information of domain name registrants will need to be compliant with data protection laws. You may not agree with others on where the balance point is, but presuming that any collection or access (which will implicitly be limited to those with specific needs) will be unlawful is incorrect.
Alan
At 09/10/2018 03:05 AM, farzaneh badii wrote:
Only some groups' priority is to have access to personal information of domain name registrants. Other groups priorities are: protecting registrants personal information and compliance with data protection laws!
-- Farzaneh
participants (2)
-
Alan Greenberg -
farzaneh badii