A possible solution to the issue below is going back to the recommendations concerning SLAs, automation, etc. and identifying the issues in relation to each of the recommendations that are considered implementation and could be addressed through recommendation 19. Hadia ________________________________________ From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia@tra.gov.eg> Sent: 23 June 2020 13:51 To: Marika Konings; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Alternative recommendation #19 posted for review Dear All, First I would like to thank Amr and all those who worked on the drafting of this recommendation. However, the recommendation as currently drafted does not solve the issue of adding improvements to the implementation of certain recommendations namely Service Level Agreements (SLAs), automation, third party purposes, financial sustainability and operational / system enhancements. The recommendation says " Identification of issues, which the Committee may address shall be determined using the following two methods: 1. Any policy or implementation topic concerning SSAD operations may be raised by a member of the GNSO Standing Committee, and shall be placed on the Committee's working agenda if seconded by at least one other Committee member" An example of how this recommendation could be used: if a member of the standing committee puts forward a request to discuss adding an automated use case to the implementation - automation is one of the topics spelled out in the document - the committee might consider this a policy issue and record it, so that it can be considered through a future PDP. There is nothing in the current recommendation that makes a distinction between what is considered implementation and what is considered policy. Spelling out the topics without making this distinction leaves us just where we are. Nevertheless, the recommendation is a good start but needs a little bit of clarification in relation to what is policy and what is implementation. Talk to you shortly Hadia ________________________________ From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Sent: 23 June 2020 12:26 To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Alternative recommendation #19 posted for review Dear EPDP Team, Following the small team deliberations, an alternative recommendation #19 has now been posted for your review and consideration: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17gGzz6K-zKuSK71FluHCowZo3p6tFEd3/view?usp=s.... Please identify any cannot live with items by Monday 29 June at the latest. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.