Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model + agenda for Thursday's meeting
OFFICIAL Thank you for the proposed SSAD model to consider going forward. While this is a good step forward from the initial CPH proposal, we do not believe that it has captured the views expressed by the GAC in both the small group and plenary discussions and as part of comments upon draft language. Most importantly, the draft does not sufficiently reflect inputs regarding the need for any SSAD model to: 1) automate to the greatest extent that is possible at the start and move towards automating a greater proportion of activities (we anticipate that the percentage of automated decisions will increase as we obtain more information on legal issues and the system's operational capacity) 2) ensure the confidentiality of law enforcement requests. We would propose editing the introductory language to reflect these points. There are also a number of updates to the initial report that we are discussing but initially feel would require some further work before they would become acceptable. We look forward to working with the group both at the forthcoming plenary discussion and /or at the face to face meeting to make this happen. Best Regards Chris Lewis-Evans From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: 21 January 2020 14:44 To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model + agenda for Thursday's meeting Dear EPDP Team, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting which is scheduled for Thursday 23 January at 14.00 UTC. Also, you will find attached the proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model. Please consider this proposal with your respective group and come prepared to Thursday's meeting to share your groups feedback - this will be crucial to prepare for a productive F2F meeting. Do note that updates to the preliminary recommendations in the proposal only relate to changes that would bring the preliminary recommendations in line with the proposal described in the document - other comments and/or highlights have been removed for ease of reading and will be considered after the group's review of the proposal. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #41 Proposed Agenda Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a) Update from the legal committee b) ICANN follow up on Belgian DPA response to Strawberry letter - see questions suggested by Marc Anderson: * Is ICANN expecting an additional communication on the Strawberry letter? * Would ICANN org like feedback from the EPDP Team before it meets with the Belgian DPA? 4. Introduction of Proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model ("The Chameleon") a) Staff overview b) EPDP Team reactions c) Confirm next steps 5. Plans for F2F meeting in Los Angeles a) Leadership Priorities b) EPDP Team input c) Confirmation of expected homework / preparations by EPDP Team for the LA F2F meeting d) Confirm next steps 6. Continue review of issues list (those items not dependent on item #4), if time allows a) See highlighted items on the issue list (to be circulated) b) EPDP Team input c) Confirm next steps 7. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): a) Monday 27 January 2020 at 9.00 local time at the ICANN office b) Confirm action items c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ This information is supplied in confidence by NCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under data protection legislation. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the NCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@nca.gov.uk. All E-Mail sent and received by NCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by NCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within NCA, on authority from the Director General or their Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
Well said, Chris. We agree, and we look forward to productive collaboration on this soon. Brian J. King Director of Internet Policy and Industry Affairs T +1 443 761 3726 markmonitor.com<http://www.markmonitor.com> MarkMonitor Protecting companies and consumers in a digital world From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of LEWIS-EVANS, Christopher Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 2:51 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model + agenda for Thursday's meeting OFFICIAL Thank you for the proposed SSAD model to consider going forward. While this is a good step forward from the initial CPH proposal, we do not believe that it has captured the views expressed by the GAC in both the small group and plenary discussions and as part of comments upon draft language. Most importantly, the draft does not sufficiently reflect inputs regarding the need for any SSAD model to: 1) automate to the greatest extent that is possible at the start and move towards automating a greater proportion of activities (we anticipate that the percentage of automated decisions will increase as we obtain more information on legal issues and the system's operational capacity) 2) ensure the confidentiality of law enforcement requests. We would propose editing the introductory language to reflect these points. There are also a number of updates to the initial report that we are discussing but initially feel would require some further work before they would become acceptable. We look forward to working with the group both at the forthcoming plenary discussion and /or at the face to face meeting to make this happen. Best Regards Chris Lewis-Evans From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: 21 January 2020 14:44 To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model + agenda for Thursday's meeting Dear EPDP Team, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting which is scheduled for Thursday 23 January at 14.00 UTC. Also, you will find attached the proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model. Please consider this proposal with your respective group and come prepared to Thursday's meeting to share your groups feedback - this will be crucial to prepare for a productive F2F meeting. Do note that updates to the preliminary recommendations in the proposal only relate to changes that would bring the preliminary recommendations in line with the proposal described in the document - other comments and/or highlights have been removed for ease of reading and will be considered after the group's review of the proposal. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #41 Proposed Agenda Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes) 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair) 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes) a) Update from the legal committee b) ICANN follow up on Belgian DPA response to Strawberry letter - see questions suggested by Marc Anderson: * Is ICANN expecting an additional communication on the Strawberry letter? * Would ICANN org like feedback from the EPDP Team before it meets with the Belgian DPA? 4. Introduction of Proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model ("The Chameleon") a) Staff overview b) EPDP Team reactions c) Confirm next steps 5. Plans for F2F meeting in Los Angeles a) Leadership Priorities b) EPDP Team input c) Confirmation of expected homework / preparations by EPDP Team for the LA F2F meeting d) Confirm next steps 6. Continue review of issues list (those items not dependent on item #4), if time allows a) See highlighted items on the issue list (to be circulated) b) EPDP Team input c) Confirm next steps 7. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes): a) Monday 27 January 2020 at 9.00 local time at the ICANN office b) Confirm action items c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ This information is supplied in confidence by NCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under data protection legislation. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the NCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@nca.gov.uk<mailto:PICUEnquiries@nca.gov.uk>. All E-Mail sent and received by NCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by NCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within NCA, on authority from the Director General or their Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
participants (2)
-
King, Brian -
LEWIS-EVANS, Christopher