Dear EPDP team colleagues: Attached is a memo that is intended to clarify some of the issues related to accreditation. It is meant to be an objective identification of the issues involved, not an advocacy of a particular position. Specifically, I see two distinct purposes that can be identified that people are often combining or confusing when they discuss accreditation. This memo isolates them, defines them, and tries to tease out their implications. I hope that staff/Janis can agree to distribute this memo when we enter into accreditation discussions on the agenda. Dr. Milton L Mueller Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy [IGP_logo_gold block]
Thank you, Milton. In my mind good input to stimulate discussion. It would be good if team members would volunteer to do similar write-ups on all so far untouched issues. With greetings from DoubleTree hotel JK From: Mueller, Milton L [mailto:milton@gatech.edu] Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2019 4:37 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Cc: Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com>; Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Subject: Memo on accreditation Dear EPDP team colleagues: Attached is a memo that is intended to clarify some of the issues related to accreditation. It is meant to be an objective identification of the issues involved, not an advocacy of a particular position. Specifically, I see two distinct purposes that can be identified that people are often combining or confusing when they discuss accreditation. This memo isolates them, defines them, and tries to tease out their implications. I hope that staff/Janis can agree to distribute this memo when we enter into accreditation discussions on the agenda. Dr. Milton L Mueller Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy
All, Like Milton I've also thinking about accreditation. Based on our recent discussions and the various comments in/on the Zero Draft it was clear we need a high level (50,000 ft level) framework to put the various aspects of this topic into context. I hope everyone finds this helpful and I'd be happy to walk the team thru this during our discussions this week. Thanks! Alex ___________ *Alex Deacon* Cole Valley Consulting alex@colevalleyconsulting.com +1.415.488.6009 On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 8:30 AM jk <karklinsj@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, Milton. In my mind good input to stimulate discussion.
It would be good if team members would volunteer to do similar write-ups on all so far untouched issues.
With greetings from DoubleTree hotel
JK
*From:* Mueller, Milton L [mailto:milton@gatech.edu] *Sent:* Sunday, September 8, 2019 4:37 PM *To:* gnso-epdp-team@icann.org *Cc:* Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com>; Marika Konings < marika.konings@icann.org> *Subject:* Memo on accreditation
Dear EPDP team colleagues:
Attached is a memo that is intended to clarify some of the issues related to accreditation. It is meant to be an objective identification of the issues involved, not an advocacy of a particular position. Specifically, I see two distinct purposes that can be identified that people are often combining or confusing when they discuss accreditation. This memo isolates them, defines them, and tries to tease out their implications.
I hope that staff/Janis can agree to distribute this memo when we enter into accreditation discussions on the agenda.
Dr. Milton L Mueller
Georgia Institute of Technology
School of Public Policy
[image: IGP_logo_gold block]
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Milton and Alex, thanks for these memos. I have belatedly discovered an additional use of the term “accreditation” in a related context: the accreditation by a DPA of a party which will monitor compliance to a Code of Conduct which has been approved by that DPA. See https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/edpb_guidelines_201901_v... “‘Accreditation’ refers to the ascertainment that the proposed monitoring body meets the requirements set out in Article 41 of the GDPR to carry out the monitoring of compliance with a code of conduct. This check is undertaken by the supervisory authority where the code is submitted for approval (Article 41(1)). The accreditation of a monitoring body applies only for a specific code.” From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alex Deacon Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 07:48 To: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Memo on accreditation All, Like Milton I've also thinking about accreditation. Based on our recent discussions and the various comments in/on the Zero Draft it was clear we need a high level (50,000 ft level) framework to put the various aspects of this topic into context. I hope everyone finds this helpful and I'd be happy to walk the team thru this during our discussions this week. Thanks! Alex ___________ Alex Deacon Cole Valley Consulting alex@colevalleyconsulting.com<mailto:alex@colevalleyconsulting.com> +1.415.488.6009 On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 8:30 AM jk <karklinsj@gmail.com<mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>> wrote: Thank you, Milton. In my mind good input to stimulate discussion. It would be good if team members would volunteer to do similar write-ups on all so far untouched issues. With greetings from DoubleTree hotel JK From: Mueller, Milton L [mailto:milton@gatech.edu<mailto:milton@gatech.edu>] Sent: Sunday, September 8, 2019 4:37 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Cc: Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com<mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>; Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Subject: Memo on accreditation Dear EPDP team colleagues: Attached is a memo that is intended to clarify some of the issues related to accreditation. It is meant to be an objective identification of the issues involved, not an advocacy of a particular position. Specifically, I see two distinct purposes that can be identified that people are often combining or confusing when they discuss accreditation. This memo isolates them, defines them, and tries to tease out their implications. I hope that staff/Janis can agree to distribute this memo when we enter into accreditation discussions on the agenda. Dr. Milton L Mueller Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy [IGP_logo_gold block] _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (4)
-
Alex Deacon -
jk -
Mark Svancarek (CELA) -
Mueller, Milton L