Thanks Steve.  Thanks Marika.

 

I made a few notes under Steve’s notes.  As I mention there, I agree with Steve that we should be careful not to make any avoidable mistakes in our data gathering experiment, but I don’t agree with Steve that the experiment itself is an error.  The GNSO has a real chance to take a real step toward solving a real problem that has plagued us for several years now.  Let’s not miss the chance.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

 



Taft  /
Paul D. McGrady, Jr.
Partner
PMcGrady@taftlaw.com
Dir: 312.836.4094   |   Cell: 312.882.5020
Tel: 312.527.4000   |   Fax: 312.754.2354
111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2800
Chicago, Illinois 60601-3713

Download vCard
taftlaw.com


This message may contain information that is attorney-client privileged, attorney work product or otherwise confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, use and disclosure of this message are prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.

From: GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam <gnso-epdpp2-smallteam-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Steve Crocker
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 10:42 AM
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
Cc: gnso-epdpp2-smallteam@icann.org
Subject: Re: [GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam] Reminder & Proposed Agenda for EPDP Phase 2 Small Team meeting with ICANN Org to assess Proof of Concept proposed Requirements

 

[EXTERNAL MESSAGE]

Marika,

 

Thanks.  I have added text and comments.  In brief, there is a huge disconnect here.  You cannot get meaningful quantitative usage data until there is a usable system.  The proposed plan is a mistake.

 

Steve

 

 

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:35 AM Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:

Dear All,

 

As a reminder, please provide any further input and/or suggestions you may have on the Proof of Concept Outline & Requirements (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m3dANwxKK_q8gk5OTBcANkPk-PkTOCMS/edit?pli=1) by the end of today. The staff support team has made some minor updates in line with yesterday’s meeting (in redline).

 

For Monday’s meeting, hereby the proposed agenda:

 

EPDP Phase 2 Small Team meeting with ICANN org to assess Proof of Concept proposed Requirements – Monday 28 March at 14.00 UTC

 

  1. Welcome
  2. Walk through of Proof of Concept Outline & Expectations with ICANN org
    1. What is the Proof of Concept expected to prove / disprove?
    2. Which aspects of the SSAD recommendations are expected to be part of the proof of concept to provide essential insights?
    3. Q & A – any clarifying questions to better understand the small teams expectations
    4. Initial reactions – e.g. what is likely possible, what may be possible, what is likely impossible
  1. Small team to consider what updates, if any, should be made to Proof of Concept based on discussion under #2
  2. Confirm next steps & next EPDP Phase 2 Small Team meeting (Wednesday 30 March at 14.00 UTC)

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

_______________________________________________
GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam mailing list
GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdpp2-smallteam

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.