Hi Steve,
Sorry for the late response, I was keen on better understanding our timelines before scheduling further meetings. I shared my views regarding that in my previous email today.
While we organize for the ODP team to conduct its scoping work, I am more than happy to organize further discussions with the Small Team to discuss these topics and any other the
team may see fit.
The easiest is probably for Staff to circulate a Doodle Poll to find a time block that works for all.
In the same vein: I do not want to change the representative model of this team, but as it is taking more time than initially anticipated, I think it is fair to offer any member
the opportunity to step down and designate someone to replace them.
Kindly,
Sebastien Ducos
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
+33612284445
France & Australia
From:
GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam <gnso-epdpp2-smallteam-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org>
Date: Thursday, 14 April 2022 at 4:23 pm
To: gnso-epdpp2-smallteam@icann.org <gnso-epdpp2-smallteam@icann.org>
Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org <gnso-secs@icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam] next steps
|
You don't often get email from sdelbianco@netchoice.org.
Learn why this is important |
Caution:
This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious
emails to isitbad@.
Just listened to Council discussion of our small team report today.
What I heard argues for our Small Team to hold at least one more meeting:
1. councilors heard that PoC will assess request volumes, which would help in determining costs of an eventual SSAD (p.6 item 5 in our attached report: "SSAD PoC should run for period of time
to gather representative picture of request volume..."
But as noted in a footnote of our report, I believe we will have low request volume for a Ticketing System that does not improve upon today’s experience of delayed responses and non-disclosures.
Low volume experience will undermine our contention that we need to improve upon the status quo.
2. Heard some discussion of the attached InfoNetworks proposal for an “SSAD Pilot that addresses the actual goal for the SSAD development process and demonstrates its viability (p.7)”. Our
small team could assess that option.
Moreover, another part of the InfoNetworks paper deserves our consideration: InfoNetworks is helping DotMusic to seek “action guidance” from Cyprus DPA, based upon a detailed reference implementation
and privacy impact assessment.
We should examine that Cyprus experience as an option for seeking SSAD guidance from the EDPB. I would like to understand the time and cost of developing the minimum documentation and reference
implementation required for Org to seek EDPB guidance.
Sincerely,
Steve DelBianco
ICANN Business Constituency
--
President & CEO, NetChoice
+1-703-615-6206