All,

 

Thank you Marika for sending out the link and getting the report started.

 

I spent a little bit of time thinking about the reporting requirements we are asking for (section 2).  Using the list from the document as a starting point, I tried to flush out the report a little more and came up with the following:

1. Number of registrars participating (total):
2. Number of new participating registrars (current reporting period):
3. Number of requestors (total):
4. Number of new requestors (current reporting period):
5. Number of disclosure requests (total and current reporting period):
6. Number of disclosure requests by priority (total and current reporting period):
7. Number of disclosure requests by requestor type (LEA, IP, Cybersecurity, etc) (total and current reporting period):
8. Number of disclosure requests broken out by participating and non-participating registrars (total and current reporting period):
9. Number of open disclosure requests (total):
10. Number of closed disclosure requests (total and current reporting period):
11. Number of closed disclosure requests by type (approved, partial approval, rejected, etc), (total and current reporting period):
12. Average disclosure request response time (total and current reporting period):

I think it makes sense to ask for this report on a monthly basis.  That would be a useful interval for viewing trends and building in natural checkpoints for the small team to monitor and review.

 

If its useful I could drop this list into the google document, but I wanted to start the conversation here on the mailing list.  Its important that we flush out the reporting requirements as this is the data we would use to evaluate the success or failure of the proof of concept and determine next steps, if we decide to proceed.

Thank you,

Marc

 

 

 

 

Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear All,

 

As discussed, please find a first draft of the EPDP Phase 2 small team addendum to the preliminary report for your review here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Uj8jWtcKwzS4swLCGNKIU5JBMT9Paij-/edit.

 

You are encouraged to add any comments and/or proposed edits you have in the form of comments. Please review this in advance of the next meeting of the small team which is scheduled for Monday 10 October at 14.00 UTC. You are especially encouraged to provide your input on question 3 which does not have any content at this stage.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika