Dear All,

Per action item #2, please find here the google doc to facilitate your collaboration on the success criteria: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aGcf02uYXXLQCll9vVrNbMG6gY5bn37U/edit.

In setting up this document, we realized that there may be two types of success criteria that have been discussed to date: 1) success criteria that are directly linked to the operation of the system and 2) success criteria that are focused on the overall goal of the RDRS to deliver data to help inform a decision on the SSAD recommendations. Although the priority may be 2), these may not be achieved if the success criteria as part of 1) are not delivered on. We’ve taken a stab at including the different suggestions made to date in the table in the google doc, but those that have been identified as the proposers should feel free to edit / move these as appropriate. Furthermore, we would like to encourage the proposers to complete the rationale column to better understand why you are proposing the specific success criteria.

All members are encouraged to add additional success criteria plus rationale, as well as any comments or questions you may have in relation to success criteria that have been proposed.

Our suggestion is that once the team has agreed on a set of success criteria, the team consider further how each success criteria can be measured / determined during the course of implementation.

Please provide your input in the google doc ahead of the next meeting which is scheduled for Monday 17 April at 17.30 UTC.

Lastly, there was one further action item in addition to the ones listed below:

4. Members who expressed interest in discussing items in Topic 4 (1) API, 2) confidentiality options for LE requests, 3) billing mechanism, 4) review of terms and conditions for requestors as well as participating registrars, 5) requests submitted fall under “reasonable access” & phase 1 requirements; 6) ability for requestor to indicate if they do not agree with information logged by registrar) to provide additional context – specifically, what are these members looking for.

Best regards,

Caitlin & Marika

From: GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam <gnso-epdpp2-smallteam-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>
Date: Monday, 10 April 2023 at 23:09
To: "gnso-epdpp2-smallteam@icann.org" <gnso-epdpp2-smallteam@icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam] Action Items - EPDP Phase 2 Small Team Meeting - 10 April 2023

Dear All,

Please find below the action items from the EPDP Phase 2 Small Team meeting today, 10 April 2023.

Action Items

1. ICANN org RDRS Project Team to provide the EPDP Phase 2A Small Team with a digestible version of the data model (such as a chart) as soon as possible. Data Model to include a transaction table for transfers to registrars and a table for registrar responses. (Note: due to the upcoming holiday weekend, the Project Team will not be able to provide this is advance of the next meeting.)
2. Policy Support Staff to create a Google Doc, where the Small Team can collaborate between meetings to add to the draft success criteria, et. al.
3. Small Team to collaborate on draft success criteria in the Google Doc before next meeting on Monday, 17 April.

 -- 

As a reminder, our next call will be Monday, 17 April at 17:30 UTC for one hour.

Kind regards,

Marika and Caitlin