This is precisely why I think we need to have a vote that is much more obvious about who is voting in support (or not) of what.

It should ALSO be made VERY clear what an abstention means. I take it to mean "no" but I know that is not a universal view.

--
Reg Levy
Director of Compliance
Tucows

D: +1 (323) 880-0831
O: +1 (416) 535-0123 x1452

UTC -7

On 11 Jun 2018, at 15:00, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:

Actually, I spoke too soon. For Recommendation #2, the text was
changed (to what I initially thought was acceptable), but it only
captured *part* of the change, not the full change. i.e. my change
was:

"An IGO may consider this to be an option where it does not have
registered trademark rights or service mark rights in its name or
acronym (as applicable) but believes it has certain unregistered
trademark or service marks rights for which it might adduce….."

But this new document instead says:

"An IGO may consider this to be an option where it does not have
registered trademark rights or service mark rights in its name or
acronym (as applicable) but believes it has certain unregistered
rights for which it might adduce….."

i.e. the *second* "trademark or service" marks is *missing* from this
new version. So, unless the wording is changed again, count me as *NOT
SUPPORT* of this text.

I'm going to go through this more thoroughly later, and consolidate
all future comments into a single email.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/









On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:34 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
This is late, and given what I've posted the past few days, one would
have expected it to have been triple-checked for accuracy, etc. I went
directly to Recommendation #2, and noticed I'm now listed as "Support"
and Paul Tattersfield is listed as "do not support" (whereas in the
document before this, sent by Petter, both Paul T. and I were listed
as "do not support"):

https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001238.html

Here was my comment:
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001219.html

and Paul T's: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001237.html

both of us wanted slight changing of the wording.

So, I see that the document that Steve circulated *does* change the
wording, so my "Support" in the new document is accurate. But, then
since Paul T agreed with me (and presumably agrees with the new text),
why is he still listed as "Do Not Support"???

Also,  we know from posts on the mailing list that Jim Bikoff
expressly said he only supports Recommendation #1 !

https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-June/001256.html

"All, please understand my position in support of recommendation 1
that no change to UDRP or URS or special procedure is warranted.

No support for other recommendations."

So, that's 2 errors (i.e. Paul T flips to "Support" and Jim Bikoff is
added to "Do not support")

So, this *still* has *obvious* errors, and I haven't even reviewed it
closely (so there could be, and probably are, even more). I have so
little confidence, I basically have to *redo* it on my own, on a
compressed time frame.

As for the agenda, I'd like my new Section 3.7 appeal to be a topic
added to the agenda (which does require a call between the chair and
myself, and since we're both going to be present -- or it could be
immediately after the call), along with the general topic of how it's
humanly possible to get a final report out by Sunday. Or if it's
already been decided that that timeline is off the table, tell us now,
to release some pressure from this PDP.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/






















On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WG Members,



With apologies for late delivery, as George noted, please find the proposed
agenda for the WG call on 12 June 2018 at 16:00 UTC for 90 minutes.



Welcome / SOIs
Review of Initial Consensus Level Designations
Next Steps
AOB



In regards to agenda item 2, please see the attached document to support
those discussions. This document follows and is a revised version of the one
sent by Petter on 9 June 2018.



Best,

Steve

















Steven Chan

Policy Director, GNSO Support



ICANN

12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300

Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536

steve.chan@icann.org

mobile: +1.310.339.4410

office tel: +1.310.301.5800

office fax: +1.310.823.8649



Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting
the GNSO Newcomer pages.



Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO

Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/

http://gnso.icann.org/en/




_______________________________________________
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
_______________________________________________
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp