Thank you for the email and the attachments Mary. A lot of work has been put in
researching and presenting this information and it shows! I’m sure other
working group members will agree that this new data is very helpful.
As today is the first time I’ve seen this
data I have only had chance to give it an initial cursory look. With this in
mind I thought it may be helpful to look a little closer at the areas that may
be the most contentious / problematic before the working group call in a couple
of hours: namely the domains marked “Pretending to be” in the "use status"
column. (Column F in the full name raw data page and column I in the acronym
raw data page)
Best regards,
Paul.
Full name raw data (9 entries from 2171)
Seems on the surface at least to be genuine use? Co-existence principles?
Account suspended – Other ways of dealing with problematic sites other than UDRP/URS
african-union.org
A lot of effort has been put in however I’m not sure of the intention as the
site isn’t in English but it seems to be an Indonesian criticism site
leagueofarabstates.net
Same IP as IGO site and has the same data in the WHOIS as the IGO
Parked page with adverts on the second level
Possible suggestion/criticism site? Not sure as most of the site isn’t English
worldfoodprogramme.org
Parked at Sedo
world-intellectual-property-organization.com
302 redirect to official site
302 redirect to official site
Acronym raw data (6 entries from 1153)
euratom.info
Seems to be a criticism site
uropol.net
Seems to be a long standing (1998?) portal with links to genuine police sites
icsid.biz
Redirects to icsid.info
icsid.info
A somewhat limited criticism(?) site quoting from ICSID documents?
nato.biz
Seems to be a gateway page for нато.рф a Russian site on Nato? As the site isn’t in English I’m
not sure of the intentions of the site.
ohada.com
Looks as though it is actually the offical site
Dear all,
Please find attached: (1) an updated Pros/Cons document regarding Options 1 & 2 for Preliminary Recommendation #4; and (2) an illustrative, limited sampling of data of domain registrations relating to the IGOs currently on the GAC’s 2013 list. As noted in the document, none of its contents nor the data sampling is meant to indicate a staff view on the topic under discussion; rather, we are providing these in the hope that they will facilitate the Working Group’s discussion. Please note also that under the GNSO’s rules of procedure, Working Groups are encouraged to perform an impact analysis as part of preparation of final recommendations – we therefore hope that these drafts are helpful in that regard as well.
We will also post these to the Working Group wiki space shortly.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
_______________________________________________
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp