Thanks!

Let's discuss this further on our WG meeting this Thursday.

Best,
Petter

-- 
Petter Rindforth, LL M 





Fenix Legal KB 
Stureplan 4c, 4tr 
114 35 Stockholm 
Sweden 
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 
E-mail: petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu 
www.fenixlegal.eu 

NOTICE 
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed.
It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read,
copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains.
Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. 
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu 
Thank you


20 juni 2018 02:24:33 +02:00, skrev George Kirikos <icann@leap.com>:
Hi folks,

During the last call, Phil suggested a redline of proposed changes
would be desirable. I don't own software of my own that does this. I
also searched for online tools that do this, but couldn't find
anything suitable. But, I did attempt to create such "redline" text
manually, and it's attached as a PDP.

I started with Recommendation 2, since that was the 'easiest' (i.e.
adding 4 words, to restrict things definitively to "trademark and
service mark" rights).

For Recommendation 1, I reordered and rephrased the existing
recommendation slightly, for clarity. I also added the text that I
thought should be in a recommendation that no specific new DRP be
created for IGOs.

Since some would rather keep Recommendation 1 limited only to INGOs, I
then offered an alternative, namely adding it into Recommendation 3
instead.

Also, I'm not sure if folks noticed, but some text was deleted from
Recommendation 3, compared to what appeared in January 2017. I pointed
out phrases that we might want to put back, for clarity.

I also found a possible error in how Recommendation 3 was worded,
relative to the comparable text from January 2017. Back in January
2017, there was some text after a semi-colon (i.e. a separate
thought), that somehow got merged now into the prior text, without any
semi-colon. So, it doesn't make sense anymore to me. This stuff was
non-controversial (i.e. the assignee, licensee, agent procedural
guidance), but it kind of got mixed up with other text that was after
the semi-colon.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0266
http://www.leap.com/
_______________________________________________
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp