Dear all,

The following were captured as Action Items by staff from the last Working Group call, held on Thursday 7 December:

Working Group members who support the suggestion that a general recommendation be made, to refer the question of balancing the rights of IGO complainants with those of registrants (vis-à-vis the scenario where a losing respondent in a UDRP files proceedings in a national court and the IGO complainant succeeds in pleading jurisdictional immunity and including a possible refinement/modification of Paragraph 4(k) of the UDRP), to the RPM Review Working Group are to develop a specific proposal for full Working Group discussion at the meeting this coming Thursday (14 December); and

George Kirikos to circulate updated specific language, if possible, in relation to Option 6 for Working Group consideration.

Thanks and cheers

Mary

From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 18:08
To: "gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org>
Subject: Topics for discussion on Working Group call today

Dear all,

As a reminder, please note that for the Working Group call that is coming up in a few hours, the co-chairs plan to focus on discussing a possible Recommendation 3 and finalizing a possible approach to the various Options that have been under discussion.

To that end, staff is re-circulating the pre-ICANN60 preliminary poll results so that members may review the specific language for Options A-C. In addition, there were also follow-up discussions on this mailing list in respect of resubmission by George Kirikos of what was called “Option 6” – you can find these email threads here:

Staff has in the meantime updated the draft excerpts document that was discussed on the call last week, concerning language for Recommendations 1, 2 and 4. We will circulate the update separately for members to ensure that our updates accurately capture what was discussed and agreed.

Thanks and cheers

Mary

Thanks and cheers

Mary