I do not believe #4 Is correct. The Options are not LIMITED to amending or creating a new system. It also includes issuing a report confirming that no changes are warranted.

As I have said previously I am not in favor of either amending the current UDRP or creating a new system. I have remained open to any reasoning supporting either but have seen no evidence supporting the desirability or need for a change. I have found it particularly telling that no NGO or INGO has come forward to date although the WG has certainly been pro active in reaching out.

Sincerely,

Paul Keating, Esq.

On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:12 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:

Dear WG members,

With apologies for the slight delay, here is the proposed agenda for our next WG call, scheduled for Wednesday 29 April 2015 at 1600 UTC:

Roll call/updates to SOI
Summary of GAC advice to ICANN Board concerning protections for IGO names and acronyms (see attached)
Review status of GNSO work concerning preventative and curative rights protections for IGO names and acronyms (staff to update)
Discuss merits and disadvantages of amending existing dispute resolution processes compared to developing a new and separate procedure (based on WG discussions from prior meetings)
Next steps/next meeting

Thanks and cheers

Mary

Mary Wong

Senior Policy Director

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

Telephone: +1 603 574 4892

Email: mary.wong@icann.org

_______________________________________________
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp