- Proposed Agenda for WG call on Thursday 20 July 2017 at 1600 UTC
Dear WG Members, The proposed agenda for the upcoming WG call this Thursday 20 July 2017 at 1600 UTC is as follows; please also note that this call has been scheduled for 90 minutes: Roll call/updates to Statements of Interest Discuss co-chairs’ updated Arbitration Elements paper in relation to Recommendation #4 Option 2 Discuss Option 3, Option 4, and additional suggestion from Paul Keating Next steps and AOB For your convenience, I’ve attached the documents that Mary distributed on 17 July. Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
Just to followup on the prep for today's call, the PDF summarizing "Option #4" inadvertently left out an important point, namely the "self-termination" clause, i.e. from: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2017-June/000769.html "Lastly, we build in a clause that should ICANN fail to complete such a review within 7 years total (measured from the adoption of our final report, i.e. January 1, 2018 for the sake of argument plus 7 years would be January 1, 2025), then Option #2 is eliminated, and we go back to Option #1. Call this a "self-termination" clause, to ensure that a future review itself isn't gamed. i.e. the default is that we go back to Option #1 for everyone, except if a full review determines we can continue with Option #2 for newly created domains." It wasn't "lettered" like the other points, so was probably missed by staff due to that oversight by me. The entire email linked to above had the justification and "colour" behind the proposal, in conjunction with some of the emails back/forth to this list since then (e.g. the new precedent re: grandfathering of existing domains set by the IGO reserved policy implementation, etc.). Perhaps after all the options have been set down and discussed, it might be wise to go back and conduct the "Risk Analysis" for all options, that had already been started several meetings ago. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WG Members,
The proposed agenda for the upcoming WG call this Thursday 20 July 2017 at 1600 UTC is as follows; please also note that this call has been scheduled for 90 minutes:
Roll call/updates to Statements of Interest Discuss co-chairs’ updated Arbitration Elements paper in relation to Recommendation #4 Option 2 Discuss Option 3, Option 4, and additional suggestion from Paul Keating Next steps and AOB
For your convenience, I’ve attached the documents that Mary distributed on 17 July.
Best,
Steve
Steven Chan
Policy Director, GNSO Support
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
steve.chan@icann.org
mobile: +1.310.339.4410
office tel: +1.310.301.5800
office fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO
Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/
_______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
participants (2)
-
George Kirikos -
Steve Chan