Dear all, I am sorry but I wont be able to participate in this call. Best regards, [cid:772441814@27052015-2FF6]Osvaldo Novoa Subgerente General Antel Guatemala 1075, Nivel 22 Montevideo, 11800 Uruguay Tel. +598 2928 6400 Fax. +598 2928 6401 ________________________________ De: gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Mary Wong Enviado el: Martes, 26 de Mayo de 2015 12:37 Para: gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org Asunto: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Agenda and documents for WG call on Wednesday 27 May 2015 Dear WG members, The proposed agenda for our next WG call, scheduled for Wednesday 27 May 2015, is below: 1. Roll call/updates to SOI 2. Update from GNSO Council meeting of 21 May (WG co-chairs) 3. Review and discuss GAC response (attached) 4. Discuss possible consultation topics/questions for referral to external legal expert (the two staff briefing papers from March 2015 are attached as possible starting points) 5. Next steps Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 13:49 To: <gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org>> Subject: GAC response to WG solicitation for input Dear WG members, Please find attached the GAC's response to the set of questions that we had sent to them as part of the requisite PDP WG solicitation of input from all ICANN SO/ACs. The WG co-chairs will include a discussion of this document as an agenda item for our next WG call, currently scheduled for Wednesday 13 May 2015. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.

I found the GAC letter to be lacking. Webster's dictionary defines "dogma" as "a point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds". Unfortunately, this is what the GAC appears to have delivered in their (very brief) answers. As a PDP working group, we should not be relying on mere dogma to determine the path we take. Instead, we should look at the actual evidence and data, to see where it takes us. We've seen IGOs file UDRPs and lawsuits, just like any other entity. We've seen court cases that circumscribe and limit asserted "immunities" of IGOs.These are undeniable facts. Personally, I expected better from the GAC (and the IGOs, if/when they decide to respond to our requests). I do have confidence, though, that this working group will come to a well-reasoned conclusion based on the actual evidence. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:

Dear WG members,

The proposed agenda for our next WG call, scheduled for Wednesday 27 May 2015, is below:

Roll call/updates to SOI Update from GNSO Council meeting of 21 May (WG co-chairs) Review and discuss GAC response (attached) Discuss possible consultation topics/questions for referral to external legal expert (the two staff briefing papers from March 2015 are attached as possible starting points) Next steps

Thanks and cheers Mary

Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org

From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 13:49 To: <gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org> Subject: GAC response to WG solicitation for input

Dear WG members,

Please find attached the GAC’s response to the set of questions that we had sent to them as part of the requisite PDP WG solicitation of input from all ICANN SO/ACs. The WG co-chairs will include a discussion of this document as an agenda item for our next WG call, currently scheduled for Wednesday 13 May 2015.

Thanks and cheers Mary

Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org

_______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp