My apologies; I mistakenly sent the note below to the wrong PDP Working Group! On 12/5/16, 16:23, "Mary Wong" <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote: Dear all, In advance of the Working Group call this week, and pending circulation of the finalized agenda, please find attached the following documents for your review and further discussions: (1) A draft statement from our Working Group co-chairs regarding the provision of additional rights protection mechanisms by the TMCH and registry operators (i.e. in addition to the minimum mandatory RPMs prescribed by ICANN and which form the basis of our current Policy Development Process); and (2) A table of all the TMCH-related Charter questions, as refined and suggested by the Sub Team and including notes and questions from several Working Group members as of 4 December. This document essentially replicates the Proposed Edited Questions that were circulated in the form of the more comprehensive table that was discussed by the Sub Team, but hopefully aids your deliberations as it sets out all the proposed questions in one spot. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 12/2/16, 00:53, "George Kirikos" <icann@leap.com> wrote: I was reading the documents this morning, and the first one (which starts with "4. Deliberations of the PDP Working Group") has some very strange formatting when printed out, at least for me (e.g. many of the last sentences in paragraphs are mangled, with strange spacing or missing letters; perhaps the bolded text??). Could we have future versions of these documents in PDF, please? Sincerely, George Kirikos 4116-588-0269 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DgIFaQ&c... On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > The proposed agenda for our Working Group meeting this Thursday is as > follows: > > > > 1. Roll call and updates to Statements of Interest > > 2. Review of discussions at ICANN57 – GAC Communique and WG open > session > > 3. Confirm WG comments in draft Initial Report concerning its review > of the IGO Small Group Proposal > > 4. Confirm intended date of publication of Initial Report and other > milestones leading to the Final Report > > 5. Any other business > > > > For #2, here is the link to the GAC Communique: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gacweb.icann.org_downlo... , > and to the transcript of the Working Group session at ICANN57: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_i... . > We note that a link to the slides that were used at that WG session had been > circulated previously (see below). > > > > In addition, for #2, WG members may wish to consider the question that was > raised by the representative of the United States Patent and Trademark > Office (USPTO) who attended the WG open session: “whether [standing kicks in > at the time that a notification is submitted to WIPO or whether it kicks in > once it's disseminated to all of the Paris Convention member countries and > whether they decide whether or not to reject or not reject that > notification.” > > > > For #3, please find attached an initial draft of what will be Section 4 > (Deliberations of the PDP Working Group) of our Initial Report (where > Section 6 – which we have been discussing – contains our Preliminary > Recommendations). As noted previously, Section 4 complements Section 6 by > providing both the process background and related narrative to the actual > text of the preliminary recommendations. > > > > For purposes of the call this week, staff suggests a focus on Section 4.4 > (where the process background and the WG’s conclusions on the Small Group > Proposal are described and tabulated). > > > > We are also attaching a clean copy of the latest version of Section 6, > updated following the last WG call before ICANN57. Please note that in the > interests of getting the draft Deliberations document out to everyone as > soon as we could, staff has not yet done a full sweep through the Section 6 > document to spot overlaps and gaps. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > > From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 12:23 > To: "gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org> > Subject: Slides from the Working Group's open community discussion at > ICANN57 > > > > Dear all, > > > > The slides from our Working Group’s open session yesterday at ICANN57, where > our likely initial recommendations were presented to the community, are > available here: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__schd.ws_hosted-5Ffiles_i... . > > > > Once the transcript and recording are published on the ICANN57 meeting > website, we will provide a link to them and the slides from our Working > Group wiki page. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > > > > Mary Wong > > Senior Policy Director > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Email: mary.wong@icann.org > > Telephone: +1-603-5744889 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list > Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp