Dear IGO&INGO IRT,

As we were preparing to publish the policy, we needed to produce a machine-readable reserved list as mentioned in the implementation notes.

In doing so, we’ve found a better approach which will make it easier for those involved in the implementation and likely reduce confusion of having two reserved lists with duplicated names.

Instead of producing a separate reserved name list for the policy as we had originally planned, we’ve decided to update the existing reserved name list that is already published.

In another word, update the current machine-readable list that is already being used by the registry operators.

In summary, the identifiers that are in-scope of the policy will be gathered with references to the policy while the identifiers that are out-of-scope for this policy will remain with the reference to the registry agreement.

Attached is a table prepared for you to see changes from the current name list to the updated list with the policy announcement.

I was going to host another IRT meeting to explain this but thought perhaps it would be clear enough for you via this email.

Please let me know if you have questions on this or would like an IRT meeting to discuss with the team.

Otherwise, I’d appreciate your reply in support of this new approach.

—

Kind Regards,

Dennis S. Chang

GDD Services & Engagement Program Director

+1 213 293 7889

Skype: dennisSchang