ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and Continued Consensus Call on Proposed Recommendations
Hi All Please find attached the proposed Initial Report of the Reconvened WG. This is the full report that includes required sections of Executive Summary, Background, and Deliberations of the WG along with the proposed recommendations that were sent to the WG last week in preparation for that meeting. Like prior versions of the draft recommendations, Thomas has maintained a preliminary consensus level of "full consensus" for the six recommendations. The task for members as a part of the continued consensus call is to announce any objections to the currently assigned consensus level by 19 June 2018 at 23:59 UTC. Absent any objections, the Initial report will be prepared for a 30-day public comment proceeding. Thomas is prepared to have this extended to the normal 40 days upon presentation to the GNSO Council of the Reconvened WG's status at ICANN62. In addition to submission of objections, if any, members are also instructed to provide any feedback or proposed edits to this draft report. Track changes are enabled. You can make your suggested edits in the Word doc and return back to me for import into the master document. Written suggestions are also welcome on the mailing list, and I can post the changes on your behalf in to the master. Lastly, we still have two outstanding items to resolves as it relates to the variant principles and the definitive list. Please send along your support or objection as well. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/2018-June/000156.html Reconvened WG's Timeline: 07 June - complete Next meeting of the Reconvened WG (start of consensus call) 14 June - complete Reconvened WG meeting not required 18-21 June Start of Public Comment Period 23-28 June ICANN62* 18 July Close of Comment Period (30 days per Council resolution)** 19 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 26 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 28 July Close of Comment Period (40 days per standard) 02 August Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 06 August GNSO Council's Documents and Motion deadline / Send Final Report 16 August GNSO Council meeting * No planned session, but an update will be provided to the GNSO Council. ** Note that the Council resolution that kicked off this effort mentions a (30) day public comment period. However, the standard is (40) days. Thomas will ask the Council at ICANN62 whether an extension to 40 days is warranted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com @berrycobb
Thanks Berry. Here is my input: * I have no objections to the currently assigned consensus levels for the six recommendations, i.e., I support all six recommendations. * I suggest that there be a 40-day comment period. I have at least three reasons for this suggestion: 1) the comment period includes the time of ICANN62 and it has been practice for several years to adjust comment periods in recognition that community members are extremely busy in preparation for and during ICANN meetings; 2) a 40-day comment period should minimize the chance of there being any requests for extension; 3) it appears that some SGs, Constituencies and ACs are not represented in the table of members who reconfirmed their intent to participate in the consensus call (RrSG, NCSG, At-Large) so those groups may require a little more time. * I have no edits to the report. * I affirm my support for the two outstanding items related to variant principles. Chuck From: Gnso-igo-ingo <gnso-igo-ingo-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of mail@berrycobb.com Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 8:09 PM To: gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and Continued Consensus Call on Proposed Recommendations Importance: High Hi All Please find attached the proposed Initial Report of the Reconvened WG. This is the full report that includes required sections of Executive Summary, Background, and Deliberations of the WG along with the proposed recommendations that were sent to the WG last week in preparation for that meeting. Like prior versions of the draft recommendations, Thomas has maintained a preliminary consensus level of "full consensus" for the six recommendations. The task for members as a part of the continued consensus call is to announce any objections to the currently assigned consensus level by 19 June 2018 at 23:59 UTC. Absent any objections, the Initial report will be prepared for a 30-day public comment proceeding. Thomas is prepared to have this extended to the normal 40 days upon presentation to the GNSO Council of the Reconvened WG's status at ICANN62. In addition to submission of objections, if any, members are also instructed to provide any feedback or proposed edits to this draft report. Track changes are enabled. You can make your suggested edits in the Word doc and return back to me for import into the master document. Written suggestions are also welcome on the mailing list, and I can post the changes on your behalf in to the master. Lastly, we still have two outstanding items to resolves as it relates to the variant principles and the definitive list. Please send along your support or objection as well. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/2018-June/000156.html Reconvened WG's Timeline: 07 June - complete Next meeting of the Reconvened WG (start of consensus call) 14 June - complete Reconvened WG meeting not required 18-21 June Start of Public Comment Period 23-28 June ICANN62* 18 July Close of Comment Period (30 days per Council resolution)** 19 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 26 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 28 July Close of Comment Period (40 days per standard) 02 August Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 06 August GNSO Council's Documents and Motion deadline / Send Final Report 16 August GNSO Council meeting * No planned session, but an update will be provided to the GNSO Council. ** Note that the Council resolution that kicked off this effort mentions a (30) day public comment period. However, the standard is (40) days. Thomas will ask the Council at ICANN62 whether an extension to 40 days is warranted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com <mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> @berrycobb
+1 David W. Maher Public Interest Registry Senior Vice-President - Law & Policy +1 312 375 4849 From: Gnso-igo-ingo <gnso-igo-ingo-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 6:44 AM To: mail@berrycobb.com; gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and Continued Consensus Call on Proposed Recommendations Thanks Berry. Here is my input: * I have no objections to the currently assigned consensus levels for the six recommendations, i.e., I support all six recommendations. * I suggest that there be a 40-day comment period. I have at least three reasons for this suggestion: 1) the comment period includes the time of ICANN62 and it has been practice for several years to adjust comment periods in recognition that community members are extremely busy in preparation for and during ICANN meetings; 2) a 40-day comment period should minimize the chance of there being any requests for extension; 3) it appears that some SGs, Constituencies and ACs are not represented in the table of members who reconfirmed their intent to participate in the consensus call (RrSG, NCSG, At-Large) so those groups may require a little more time. * I have no edits to the report. * I affirm my support for the two outstanding items related to variant principles. Chuck From: Gnso-igo-ingo <gnso-igo-ingo-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of mail@berrycobb.com<mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 8:09 PM To: gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and Continued Consensus Call on Proposed Recommendations Importance: High Hi All Please find attached the proposed Initial Report of the Reconvened WG. This is the full report that includes required sections of Executive Summary, Background, and Deliberations of the WG along with the proposed recommendations that were sent to the WG last week in preparation for that meeting. Like prior versions of the draft recommendations, Thomas has maintained a preliminary consensus level of "full consensus" for the six recommendations. The task for members as a part of the continued consensus call is to announce any objections to the currently assigned consensus level by 19 June 2018 at 23:59 UTC. Absent any objections, the Initial report will be prepared for a 30-day public comment proceeding. Thomas is prepared to have this extended to the normal 40 days upon presentation to the GNSO Council of the Reconvened WG's status at ICANN62. In addition to submission of objections, if any, members are also instructed to provide any feedback or proposed edits to this draft report. Track changes are enabled. You can make your suggested edits in the Word doc and return back to me for import into the master document. Written suggestions are also welcome on the mailing list, and I can post the changes on your behalf in to the master. Lastly, we still have two outstanding items to resolves as it relates to the variant principles and the definitive list. Please send along your support or objection as well. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/2018-June/000156.html Reconvened WG's Timeline: 07 June - complete Next meeting of the Reconvened WG (start of consensus call) 14 June - complete Reconvened WG meeting not required 18-21 June Start of Public Comment Period 23-28 June ICANN62* 18 July Close of Comment Period (30 days per Council resolution)** 19 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 26 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 28 July Close of Comment Period (40 days per standard) 02 August Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 06 August GNSO Council's Documents and Motion deadline / Send Final Report 16 August GNSO Council meeting * No planned session, but an update will be provided to the GNSO Council. ** Note that the Council resolution that kicked off this effort mentions a (30) day public comment period. However, the standard is (40) days. Thomas will ask the Council at ICANN62 whether an extension to 40 days is warranted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com<mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> @berrycobb
Dear Berry, As you know from an earlier e-mail to you and Stephane I’m comfortable but I had a few questions about National Societies yet to enter the Movement but on the membership path which I hope will be taken into account. Best wishes Chris From: mail@berrycobb.com Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 13:09 To: gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and ContinuedConsensus Call on Proposed Recommendations Hi All Please find attached the proposed Initial Report of the Reconvened WG. This is the full report that includes required sections of Executive Summary, Background, and Deliberations of the WG along with the proposed recommendations that were sent to the WG last week in preparation for that meeting. Like prior versions of the draft recommendations, Thomas has maintained a preliminary consensus level of “full consensus” for the six recommendations. The task for members as a part of the continued consensus call is to announce any objections to the currently assigned consensus level by 19 June 2018 at 23:59 UTC. Absent any objections, the Initial report will be prepared for a 30-day public comment proceeding. Thomas is prepared to have this extended to the normal 40 days upon presentation to the GNSO Council of the Reconvened WG’s status at ICANN62. In addition to submission of objections, if any, members are also instructed to provide any feedback or proposed edits to this draft report. Track changes are enabled. You can make your suggested edits in the Word doc and return back to me for import into the master document. Written suggestions are also welcome on the mailing list, and I can post the changes on your behalf in to the master. Lastly, we still have two outstanding items to resolves as it relates to the variant principles and the definitive list. Please send along your support or objection as well. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/2018-June/000156.html Reconvened WG’s Timeline: 07 June – complete Next meeting of the Reconvened WG (start of consensus call) 14 June – complete Reconvened WG meeting not required 18-21 June Start of Public Comment Period 23-28 June ICANN62* 18 July Close of Comment Period (30 days per Council resolution)** 19 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 26 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 28 July Close of Comment Period (40 days per standard) 02 August Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 06 August GNSO Council’s Documents and Motion deadline / Send Final Report 16 August GNSO Council meeting * No planned session, but an update will be provided to the GNSO Council. ** Note that the Council resolution that kicked off this effort mentions a (30) day public comment period. However, the standard is (40) days. Thomas will ask the Council at ICANN62 whether an extension to 40 days is warranted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com @berrycobb -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo
Thanks very much, Berry, for getting the WG to this stage. My input below: - I agree with the consensus designations as stated. - I have no objection to Chuck's proposal that the comment period be extended; for consistency and practicality's sake this is sensible in my view. - In the final paragraph on page 3: "It is important to note that the scope of the work of this Reconvened WG did not extend..." I suggest adding for absolute clarity: "It is important to note that the scope of the work of this Reconvened WG did not, per the GNSO Council motion of [DATE], extend".... - I envision a situation where it is unclear whether Recommendation 6 applies on its own, or Recommendation 5 and 6 both apply. I have included this question as a comment in the document. - The intention and meaning of the following statement on page 13 isn't clear to me: "The Reconvened WG also understands that the GAC is the authoritative channel for any proposed changes that are to be made to the reservation list." - I have suggested some minor edits in the document attached, mainly for clarity. Best wishes to all, Heather On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:18 AM, <christopher.lamb17@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Berry,
As you know from an earlier e-mail to you and Stephane I’m comfortable but I had a few questions about National Societies yet to enter the Movement but on the membership path which I hope will be taken into account.
Best wishes
Chris
*From:* mail@berrycobb.com *Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2018 13:09 *To:* gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org *Subject:* [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and ContinuedConsensus Call on Proposed Recommendations
Hi All
Please find attached the proposed Initial Report of the Reconvened WG. This is the full report that includes required sections of Executive Summary, Background, and Deliberations of the WG along with the proposed recommendations that were sent to the WG last week in preparation for that meeting. Like prior versions of the draft recommendations, Thomas has maintained a preliminary consensus level of “full consensus” for the six recommendations.
The task for members as a part of the continued consensus call is to announce *any objections* to the currently assigned consensus level by *19 June 2018 at 23:59 UTC*. Absent any objections, the Initial report will be prepared for a 30-day public comment proceeding. Thomas is prepared to have this extended to the normal 40 days upon presentation to the GNSO Council of the Reconvened WG’s status at ICANN62.
In addition to submission of objections, if any, members are also instructed to provide any feedback or proposed edits to this draft report. Track changes are enabled. You can make your suggested edits in the Word doc and return back to me for import into the master document. Written suggestions are also welcome on the mailing list, and I can post the changes on your behalf in to the master.
Lastly, we still have two outstanding items to resolves as it relates to the variant principles and the definitive list. Please send along your support or objection as well.
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/2018-June/000156.html
*Reconvened WG’s Timeline:*
*07 June – complete *
*Next meeting of the Reconvened WG (start of consensus call)*
*14 June – complete*
*Reconvened WG meeting not required*
18-21 June
Start of Public Comment Period
23-28 June
ICANN62*
18 July
Close of Comment Period (30 days per Council resolution)**
19 July
Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report
26 July
Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report
28 July
Close of Comment Period (40 days per standard)
02 August
Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report
06 August
GNSO Council’s Documents and Motion deadline / Send Final Report
16 August
GNSO Council meeting
* No planned session, but an update will be provided to the GNSO Council.
** Note that the Council resolution that kicked off this effort mentions a (30) day public comment period. However, the standard is (40) days. Thomas will ask the Council at ICANN62 whether an extension to 40 days is warranted.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
B
Berry A. Cobb
720.839.5735
mail@berrycobb.com
@berrycobb
------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo
_______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo
Good input Heather. Regarding the next to last bullet ("The Reconvened WG also understands that the GAC is the authoritative channel for any proposed changes that are to be made to the reservation list."), I am not sure that the GAC as an Advisory body can be an authoritative channel. I think it might be better to change that sentence to something like the following: “The Reconvened WG also understands that the GAC is an important channel for any proposed changes that are to be made to the reservation list.” Chuck From: Gnso-igo-ingo <gnso-igo-ingo-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Heather Forrest Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 12:44 AM To: christopher.lamb17@gmail.com Cc: gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and ContinuedConsensus Call on Proposed Recommendations Thanks very much, Berry, for getting the WG to this stage. My input below: * I agree with the consensus designations as stated. * I have no objection to Chuck's proposal that the comment period be extended; for consistency and practicality's sake this is sensible in my view. * In the final paragraph on page 3: "It is important to note that the scope of the work of this Reconvened WG did not extend..." I suggest adding for absolute clarity: "It is important to note that the scope of the work of this Reconvened WG did not, per the GNSO Council motion of [DATE], extend".... * I envision a situation where it is unclear whether Recommendation 6 applies on its own, or Recommendation 5 and 6 both apply. I have included this question as a comment in the document. * The intention and meaning of the following statement on page 13 isn't clear to me: "The Reconvened WG also understands that the GAC is the authoritative channel for any proposed changes that are to be made to the reservation list." * I have suggested some minor edits in the document attached, mainly for clarity. Best wishes to all, Heather On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:18 AM, <christopher.lamb17@gmail.com <mailto:christopher.lamb17@gmail.com> > wrote: Dear Berry, As you know from an earlier e-mail to you and Stephane I’m comfortable but I had a few questions about National Societies yet to enter the Movement but on the membership path which I hope will be taken into account. Best wishes Chris From: mail@berrycobb.com <mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 13:09 To: gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org <mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and ContinuedConsensus Call on Proposed Recommendations Hi All Please find attached the proposed Initial Report of the Reconvened WG. This is the full report that includes required sections of Executive Summary, Background, and Deliberations of the WG along with the proposed recommendations that were sent to the WG last week in preparation for that meeting. Like prior versions of the draft recommendations, Thomas has maintained a preliminary consensus level of “full consensus” for the six recommendations. The task for members as a part of the continued consensus call is to announce any objections to the currently assigned consensus level by 19 June 2018 at 23:59 UTC. Absent any objections, the Initial report will be prepared for a 30-day public comment proceeding. Thomas is prepared to have this extended to the normal 40 days upon presentation to the GNSO Council of the Reconvened WG’s status at ICANN62. In addition to submission of objections, if any, members are also instructed to provide any feedback or proposed edits to this draft report. Track changes are enabled. You can make your suggested edits in the Word doc and return back to me for import into the master document. Written suggestions are also welcome on the mailing list, and I can post the changes on your behalf in to the master. Lastly, we still have two outstanding items to resolves as it relates to the variant principles and the definitive list. Please send along your support or objection as well. https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/2018-June/000156.html Reconvened WG’s Timeline: 07 June – complete Next meeting of the Reconvened WG (start of consensus call) 14 June – complete Reconvened WG meeting not required 18-21 June Start of Public Comment Period 23-28 June ICANN62* 18 July Close of Comment Period (30 days per Council resolution)** 19 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 26 July Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 28 July Close of Comment Period (40 days per standard) 02 August Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report 06 August GNSO Council’s Documents and Motion deadline / Send Final Report 16 August GNSO Council meeting * No planned session, but an update will be provided to the GNSO Council. ** Note that the Council resolution that kicked off this effort mentions a (30) day public comment period. However, the standard is (40) days. Thomas will ask the Council at ICANN62 whether an extension to 40 days is warranted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com <mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> @berrycobb _____ _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo
participants (5)
-
christopher.lamb17＠gmail.com -
Chuck -
David W. Maher -
Heather Forrest -
mail＠berrycobb.com