hi all,

sorry -- i'm on the road this morning and probably won't be on the beginning of the call for sure.  i'll jump in late if i get home in time.

i think the cosmic question is to put the comments in two piles -- ones that bear on implementation of the existing/approved IRTP-C policy, and those that strive to redo the whole policy-making process.  i'm willing to work through the former, completely unwilling to redo the whole policy.

mike


On Jun 3, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org> wrote:

Hi, Team.

Please save the date for our next IRTP-C Implementation Review Team call on Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 1600UTC.  A calendar invite will follow shortly.  
We will be discussing the public comments received, which can be found here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-irtp-c-30mar15/.

I have also organized the comments by category in the attached document. 

Please find the dial-in details below:

Link to Adobe Connect (with audio enabled):https://icann.adobeconnect.com/irtppartc/
*Upon logging into Adobe Connect, a pop up window will provide you the option to Dial Out to your Phone. Enter your Phone Number* (Remember to change the Country Code if needed).

After joining the call, as a courtesy to others and the presenters, please MUTE your phone. This can be done by selecting *6 on your keypad. To UNMUTE select *6 again.


If you are Unable to log into Adobe Connect and can only join via phone:

Participant Passcode: 6458688446

Best regards,

Caitlin Tubergen
Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager
ICANN


<Public Comment Review Tool ­ Proposed Implementation of GNSO PDP Recommendations on IRTP.docx>


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)