Hi Barbara,
Thank you for your feedback!
I have incorporated your changes/comments into the attached
document, which uses the most recent version of the IRTP.
Also, I took the liberty of adding some section numbers
into the IRTP to it slightly more organized.
Kind regards,
Caitlin,
I have reviewed the latest draft and have a few
comments / recommended edits (redlined in the
attached). I will also be soliciting additional
feedback from others in the Registry community but did
not want to hold up getting my initial feedback over.
I anticipate that any further feedback or comments
that may be forthcoming from the Registry community
can be provided during the comment period once it is
posted for comments. Thanks for all of your efforts.
During
the call, we discussed the outstanding issue from
our last call, which was the issue of third party
privacy/proxy providers and the potential challenge
of transmitting the change of registrant credential
to the underlying registrant. The members of the
IRT that were on the call with okay with the
proposed solution, which you will find in footnote
1.
The
P/P issue was the last outstanding issue to discuss
before we post the draft policy for public comment.
I
have attached the draft policy for your final
review. You will note that this is the hybrid
“Transfer Policy,” which will go out for public
comment. The Transfer Policy has two sections: the
IRTP in section I, and the Change of Registrant in
section II. The hybrid policy was recommended by
the WG. As you may remember, we had already worked
through recommendation 2, the time limiting of FOAs,
before we began discussing the Change of Registrant
function.
If you have any final questions or
comments on the draft policy, please submit them to
me by Thursday, 12 March.
