I do understand there may be some complexities in James' suggestion, but I agree, at the least, the implementation of IRTP-D cannot be done in isolation from the whole of IRTP policy - thanks James for reminding us all

Holly


----- Original Message -----
From:
"Dorrain Kristine" <kdorrain@adrforum.com>

To:
"Bartlett Morgan" <bartlett.morgan@gmail.com>, "Knight Barbara" <BKnight@verisign.com>
Cc:
"Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org" <Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org>
Sent:
Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:44:06 +0000
Subject:
Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2


Same.  Even though I’m not an IRTP-C member, I find value in making sure implementation is coordinated.

 

From: Bartlett Morgan [mailto:bartlett.morgan@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 7:31 AM
To: Knight, Barbara
Cc: Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2

 

I've only been involved with IRTPD but I don't have a problem with the idea.

--

Kind regards,

Bartlett D. Morgan

 


Em Jul 17, 2015, às 8:03 AM, Knight, Barbara <BKnight@verisign.com> escreveu:

I am also supportive of this approach. 

 

 <image001.gif>

Barbara Knight

Director of Registry Compliance

bknight@Verisign.com

t: 703-948-3343

c: 703-622-1071
12061 Bluemont Way, Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com

<image002.gif>

 

 

From: gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Theo Geurts
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 3:36 AM
To: James M. Bladel
Cc: Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2

 

That's actually a good idea, as I rather not come to conclusion that a decision on IRTC becomes a major headache at IRTPD. 

 

Best

 

Theo 

 

Theo Geurts
Compliance Officer

Realtime Register B.V.

Ceintuurbaan 32A
8024 AA - ZWOLLE - The Netherlands

T: +31.384530759
F: +31.384524734
U: www.realtimeregister.com
E: support@realtimeregister.com

 

 

 

Van: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>
Aan: "Caitlin Tubergen" <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>, Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
Verzonden: Vrijdag 17 juli 2015 08:58:26
Onderwerp: Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2

 

Here’s a crazy idea:  does it make sense to merge IRTP-C and IRTP-D implementation teams?  Recognizing that they would probably have different deployment dates, the two topics are very similar, and have nearly the same (identical?) work group membership.

 

Thanks—

 

J.

 

 

From: <gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 14:13
To: "Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org" <Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2

 

Hi, Team.

 

I received several emails from Implementation Review Team members who are unavailable to meet next week due to vacation plans and traveling.  Please excuse the additional doodle poll, but this poll is for the following week.  I have also added some additional times to accommodate more timezones.

 

Please respond to the new poll here: http://doodle.com/5e6hnak4di2qmn4a

 

Apologies again for the double email.  To those of you who will be on vacation, have a wonderful holiday!

 

Kind regards,

 

Caitlin Tubergen

Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager

ICANN

 

 


_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-irtpd-rt

_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
https://mmicann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-irtpd-rt