----- Original Message -----From:"Dorrain Kristine" <kdorrain@adrforum.com>To:"Bartlett Morgan" <bartlett.morgan@gmail.com>, "Knight Barbara" <BKnight@verisign.com>Cc:"Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org" <Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org>Sent:Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:44:06 +0000Subject:Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2Same. Even though I’m not an IRTP-C member, I find value in making sure implementation is coordinated.
From: Bartlett Morgan [mailto:bartlett.morgan@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 7:31 AM
To: Knight, Barbara
Cc: Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2
I've only been involved with IRTPD but I don't have a problem with the idea.
--
Kind regards,
Bartlett D. Morgan
Em Jul 17, 2015, às 8:03 AM, Knight, Barbara <BKnight@verisign.com> escreveu:I am also supportive of this approach.
<image001.gif>
Barbara Knight
Director of Registry Compliance
bknight@Verisign.com
t: 703-948-3343c: 703-622-1071
12061 Bluemont Way, Reston, VA 20190
VerisignInc.com<image002.gif>
From: gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Theo Geurts
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 3:36 AM
To: James M. Bladel
Cc: Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2
That's actually a good idea, as I rather not come to conclusion that a decision on IRTC becomes a major headache at IRTPD.
Best
Theo
Theo Geurts
Compliance Officer
Realtime Register B.V.
Ceintuurbaan 32A
8024 AA - ZWOLLE - The Netherlands
T: +31.384530759
F: +31.384524734
U: www.realtimeregister.com
E: support@realtimeregister.com
Van: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>
Aan: "Caitlin Tubergen" <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>, Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
Verzonden: Vrijdag 17 juli 2015 08:58:26
Onderwerp: Re: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2
Here’s a crazy idea: does it make sense to merge IRTP-C and IRTP-D implementation teams? Recognizing that they would probably have different deployment dates, the two topics are very similar, and have nearly the same (identical?) work group membership.
Thanks—
J.
From: <gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 14:13
To: "Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org" <Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2
Hi, Team.
I received several emails from Implementation Review Team members who are unavailable to meet next week due to vacation plans and traveling. Please excuse the additional doodle poll, but this poll is for the following week. I have also added some additional times to accommodate more timezones.
Please respond to the new poll here: http://doodle.com/5e6hnak4di2qmn4a
Apologies again for the double email. To those of you who will be on vacation, have a wonderful holiday!
Kind regards,
Caitlin Tubergen
Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager
ICANN
_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-irtpd-rt_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org
https://mmicann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-irtpd-rt