Dennis,

Thank you for sending the updated Transition Policy document.  I want to send some feedback on this version prior to Tuesday’s call/discussion.

· Roger Carney already mentioned this, but this draft contains no mention of the reduced validation rules the IRT discussed.  In fact section 2.4 requires contact operations to be supported as described in RFC 5733 which prescribes required fields.  This would prevent the implementation of reduced validation rules.

· Section 2.10 mentions Registrant/Admin/Tech contact types but does not mention the billing contact type at all.  For clarity, I would like to request the policy explicitly state if the Billing contact is required, optional, disallowed or left to the Registry to decide.

· Noting Theo’s comments about the Implementation Notes, I would like to suggest a link to the procedure be added to that section.

Thank you,

Marc Anderson

From: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Chang
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:54 PM
To: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] [for iRT review] Draft Thick Whois Transition Policy for .COM, .NET, and .JOBS

Dear Thick Whois IRT,

Thank you for your participation and contribution today.

Attached is the draft policy document we worked on at the meeting together: one version with redline and one clean as V2.

We’ll continue the team edit at our meeting next week to finalize the document.

Same time same day same call in info.

Agenda on IRT wiki:

• Transition from thin to thick
  • Draft Consensus Policy document review - continue from section 2.9
  • Public Comment readiness
• Whois Conflict Procedure (if time permits)
• Draft memo to GNSO Council regarding Privacy (if time permits)
• Next steps

— 

Kind Regards,

Dennis S. Chang

GDD Services & Engagement Program Director

+1 213 293 7889

Skype: dennisSchang

www.icann.org   "One World, One Internet"

From: <gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2016 at 5:05 PM
To: "gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org" <gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] [for iRT review] Draft Thick Whois Transition Policy for .COM, .NET, and .JOBS

Dear Thick Whois Policy Implementation Review Team,

Attached for your review is our initial draft of the Thick Whois Transition Policy for .COM, .NET and .JOBS. The draft Policy includes the various elements discussed in our recent meeting on this topic.

As you review the draft, you will find bracketed text in four sections: sections 2.9, 2.10, 3.4 and 3.5. These sections are bracketed because they reference the Registry Registration Data Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy and the Registration Data Access Protocol gTLD Profile. As you may be aware, a Request for Reconsideration (RfR) was submitted by the Registries Stakeholder Group in August regarding the Registry Registration Data Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy that was published on 26 July 2016. The RfR objects to the inclusion of RDAP in the Consensus Policy. While the RfR goes through its own process, we thought it was important to continue progressing the implementation project with the goal of opening Public Comment in September and announcing the Transition Policy by 1 February 2017 per our schedule. Therefore, the text is bracketed as it may need to be revisited pending the resolution of the RfR and we wanted to directly call the IRT’s attention to it.

We will review all contents of the document at our next IRT meeting as a team but please provide your comments in advance via email if possible.

Thank you for your support!

— 

Kind Regards,

Dennis S. Chang

GDD Services & Engagement Program Director

+1 213 293 7889

Skype: dennisSchang

www.icann.org   "One World, One Internet"