Fabien,
In response to proposal #3 below regarding the bundling of T&T and CL&D implementation, Verisign’s response is to recommend they be treated separately and we
do not support combining the two.
I do want to express our appreciation for the effort to consolidate some of the multiple RDDS related initiatives currently underway.
That said, I have discussed this with my colleagues internally and we feel that there are not great synergies between T&T and CL&D and like others on the IRT
are concerned that T&T would unnecessarily delay the work of this IRT. As such it is our recommendation that a separate IRT be formed for T&T.
Thank you,
Marc
From: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Fabien Betremieux
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 7:46 AM
To: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May
Dear IRT members,
As discussed during our meeting, we would like to request you provide your input regarding Staff’s question and proposals to address the public comments received
on our initial implementation plan (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdds-output-2015-12-03-en).
A a reminder, these question and proposals are the following:
Question:
Proposals:
Please provide your input in response to this email by Wed. 11 May COB in your time zone.
Please also note that we hope to focus our next IRT meeting (Tue. 10 May) on the implementation of the transition from thin to thick.
Best Regards
--
Fabien Betremieux
Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager
Global Domains Division, ICANN