Hello all,

1. Where a conflict exists between local privacy laws and requirements included in this Policy, ICANN’s Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Laws is available for Registry Operators and Registrars.

We didn't get around this yesterday, wich is fine. Let us see if we can have some discussion in advance about this as I am struggling with this section for a few now. 

The text itself is good, as in, this is what I expected after the discussions we had about this in the last few months. 

What I am not sure off is how to deal with this in the sense of moving forward to the comment period.
The procedure is not working, but is outside of this IRT to address, yet this IRT relies on it.

Are we going to put in a footnote in the report that says something like:
Outside the scope of the IRT to address, but we wish the Registrars and Registrants the best of luck!

Thanks,
Theo

 

 

Dennis Chang schreef op 2016-09-02 02:05 AM:

Dear Thick Whois Policy Implementation Review Team,

Attached for your review is our initial draft of the Thick Whois
Transition Policy for .COM, .NET and .JOBS. The draft Policy includes
the various elements discussed in our recent meeting on this topic.

As you review the draft, you will find bracketed text in four
sections: sections 2.9, 2.10, 3.4 and 3.5. These sections are
bracketed because they reference the Registry Registration Data
Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy and the
Registration Data Access Protocol gTLD Profile. As you may be aware, a
Request for Reconsideration (RfR) was submitted by the Registries
Stakeholder Group in August regarding the Registry Registration Data
Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy [1] that was
published on 26 July 2016. The RfR objects to the inclusion of RDAP in
the Consensus Policy. While the RfR goes through its own process, we
thought it was important to continue progressing the implementation
project with the goal of opening Public Comment in September and
announcing the Transition Policy by 1 February 2017 per our schedule.
Therefore, the text is bracketed as it may need to be revisited
pending the resolution of the RfR and we wanted to directly call the
IRT’s attention to it.

We will review all contents of the document at our next IRT meeting as
a team but please provide your comments in advance via email if
possible.

Thank you for your support!

—  

Kind Regards,

Dennis S. Chang

GDD Services & Engagement Program Director

+1 213 293 7889

Skype: dennisSchang

www.icann.org   "One World, One Internet"

  

Links:
------
[1] https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdds-labeling-policy-2016-07-26-en
_______________________________________________
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt