Fabien,

 

I agree with Marc and I have also expressed my concerns and opposition to the GNSO council regarding the idea to bundle T&T and CL&D implementation. We all appreciate the notion to consolidate the various WHOIS related projects. My recommendation is as follows: 1) T/T needs to move onto an IRT process 2) The IRD recommendations need to be evaluated and as appropriate be incorporated into other GNSO policy work on WHOIS, at a minimum as it relates to the T/T IRT and RDS PDP.

 

I understand ICANN staff has put this item on the agenda for the GDD Summit and I look forward to participating in this discussion.

 

Thank you,

Jennifer

 

 

 

From: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Anderson, Marc
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:39 AM
To: Fabien Betremieux; gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May

 

Fabien,

 

In response to proposal #3 below regarding the bundling of T&T and CL&D implementation, Verisign’s response is to recommend they be treated separately and we do not support combining the two.

 

I do want to express our appreciation for the effort to consolidate some of the multiple RDDS related initiatives currently underway.

 

That said, I have discussed this with my colleagues internally and we feel that there are not great synergies between T&T and CL&D and like others on the IRT are concerned that T&T would unnecessarily delay the work of this IRT.  As such it is our recommendation that a separate IRT be formed for T&T.

 

Thank you,

Marc

 

 

 

From: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Fabien Betremieux
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 7:46 AM
To: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May

 

Dear IRT members, 

 

As discussed during our meeting, we would like to request you provide your input regarding Staff’s question and proposals to address the public comments received on our initial implementation plan (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdds-output-2015-12-03-en).

 

A a reminder, these question and proposals are the following:

 

Question:

Proposals:

  1. Referral of the Registry vs. Registrar Expiration Date confusion for consideration by the RDS PDP Working Group
  2. Optional display of the Registrar Registration Expiration Date, with mitigation measures similar to that of the AWIP policy if displayed
  3. Proposed Bundling of T&T and CL&D implementation (more details on slide 4 of our presentation this week, available at: https://community.icann.org/display/TWCPI/IRT+Meetings)

Please provide your input in response to this email by Wed. 11 May COB in your time zone. 

 

Please also note that we hope to focus our next IRT meeting (Tue. 10 May) on the implementation of the transition from thin to thick.

 

Best Regards

-- 

Fabien Betremieux

Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager

Global Domains Division, ICANN