Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 at 20:00 UTC.
On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#feb
(transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)
Attendees:
Ronald Andruff – Commercial and Business Users Constituency – Primary – Chair
Angie Graves - Commercial and Business Users Constituency – Alternate
Greg Shatan – IPC - Alternate
Cintra Sooknanan: NPOC Primary – SCI Vice Chair
Amr Elsadr – NCUC Alternate
Jennifer Standiford - Registrar Stakeholder Group - Primary
Thomas Rickert - Nominating Committee Appointee - Alternate
Apologies:
Marie-Laure Lemineur – NPOC Alternative
ICANN Staff:
Marika Konings
Julie Hedlund
Nathalie Peregrine
Terri Agnew
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Adobe Chat Transcript 25 February 2014
Terri Agnew: Welcome to the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting on Tuesday 25th February 2014 at 20:00 UTC
Ron A:Good day everyone. Awaiting the operator to let me on the call.
Julie Hedlund:Hello everyone. I also am waiting for the operator.
Marika Konings:Same here - looks like jazz is the new trend ;-)
Julie Hedlund:Yes, very jazzy!
Ron A:I'm wondering what is going on... been holding for 5 mins now...
Julie Hedlund:I am in now. Maybe they are catching up.
Marika Konings:Still on hold
Thomas Rickert:So am I...
Thomas Rickert:Hi all!
Cintra Sooknanan:Hi everyone
Cintra Sooknanan:I'm going to see if connecting through the adobe room works
Cintra Sooknanan:if I have difficulty I'll request a dial out
Ron A:Looks like Adigo is having some staffing problems to let everyone on to the call... Will start at 15:05
Ron A:eEST
Amr Elsadr:Dialling in now.
Jennifer Standiford:hello
Amr Elsadr:I just dialled in but can't hear anything. Has the meeting started?
Ron A:Not yet Amr.
Cintra Sooknanan:no all quiet now
Amr Elsadr:Ah. Thnx. :)
Ron A:Awaiting the rest of the committee as we have all been in the queue to get into the call.
Amr Elsadr:We don't have NCSG.
Julie Hedlund:We also are missing Wolf-Ulrich from the ISPs
Ron A:Thank you, Julie.
Julie Hedlund:And missing Registry SG
Ron A:Yes, already noted. Thanks.
Terri Agnew:Greg Shatan has joined
Amr Elsadr:Thanks Thomas and Marika. That's very helpful. This will need to be changed here then.
Amr Elsadr:I was going to raise my hand, but Thomas and Greg can probably address this better than I can.
Terri Agnew:Apology from Marie-Laure Lemineur
Amr Elsadr:Since they were on the IGO/INGO WG.
Greg Shatan:The issue was that the recommendations were not in the negative....
Marika Konings:@Greg - but if it is made clear to a WG in advance that it is an option to make a recommendation against x, y or z, it may not be an issue anymore?
Greg Shatan:The IGO/INGO WG "consensus against" was not full consensus against....
Marika Konings:right, but that doesn't matter, does it? the designation would determine the level of support against x, y or z?
Greg Shatan:@Marika -- that was not possible in the instance, we would have had double the number of recommendation, which would have put us near 100 recommendations, with half there only to provide a solution to this problem.
Marika Konings:Or you could also phrase it as 'the WG reached consensus on not providing special protections on x, y or z?
Marika Konings:Right, but is that one case sufficient to change the designations where no other PDP WGs have encountered the same issue? Which I think is also a question that was raised during the last meeting. Did the sub-team go into that?
Marika Konings:and to be clear, not expressing a specific view here ;-)
Amr Elsadr:@Greg: That's what I was also thinking and hoped we could avoid. RE: 3 added designations for decision-making levels.
Amr Elsadr:A group might also opt to add recommendatins as a result of community feedback that "the group" doesn't necessarily agree to.
Amr Elsadr:Thanks Greg.
Amr Elsadr:I'm not actually sure how helpful a 24 hr notice would be, so am not sure wether it is necessary or not.
Amr Elsadr:I would add a section here to address the resubmission issue, just for clarity.
Amr Elsadr:@Greg: Agreed, but perhaps it just needs to be clarified.
Ron A:Julie: Do we have that document that Thomas is speaking about?
Greg Shatan:In the Actions #2, I think that should be Marika and Greg...
Amr Elsadr:Oh yeah!! How'd I end up there?? :)
Julie Hedlund:Yes -- you are right :-)
Amr Elsadr:I'd be happy to help though. :)
Julie Hedlund:Changed it!
Greg Shatan:@Amr; Just a good volunteer.... :-)
Julie Hedlund:@Amr: I guess it's just because you are so helpful ;-)
Greg Shatan:Merika = Marika?
Julie Hedlund:Yes -- I know a Merika too.
Julie Hedlund::-)
Marika Konings:Marika = Marika, I'm not sure who Merika is ;-)
Cintra Sooknanan::)
Julie Hedlund:Merika Kaeo -- she's on the SSAC but I don't think she wants to take on more work!
Julie Hedlund:Merike actually (not Merika)
Marika Konings:@Amr - we can try to get you some double espressos ;-)
Amr Elsadr:Thanks Ron!! :D
Julie Hedlund:Names are too similar
Julie Hedlund:We'll be sure there's lots of coffee!
Amr Elsadr:Thank you too Marika!! ;-)
Greg Shatan:@Amr -- Just don' look at your watch....
Marika Konings:And I've even done wake up calls before to make sure WG chairs would show up on time ;-)
Julie Hedlund:Thank you everyone!
Amr Elsadr:I hope it doesn't come to that Marika!! You work a lot harder than anyone on Council!! ;-)
Thomas Rickert:Thanks and bye!
Marika Konings::-)
Cintra Sooknanan:bye