Mary,
Please see below regarding Consensus Call related to WG Consensus levels proposal from SCI. I responded for IPC May 6 and Avri weighed in May 7 I think.
Thank you,
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | Suite 700
One South Church Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman@LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:57 AM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups Consensus Levels document
On 06-May-14 18:42, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
> Ron, Mary, et al – On behalf of IPC, we support. We also note that it
> is within the purview of SCI to undertake the longer term study of WG
> Consensus levels and perhaps this should be mentioned when reporting
> to Council.
With all of the GNSO Review work about to start, I would not be too quick to jump into this particular activity. As a council member my inclination would be to defer this subject to the GNSO review.
But as a SCI member, I have no objection to the request being made, it is just one I am not inclined toward. I am especially uncomfortable with the topic for the SCI as it is all tied up in the PDP by-laws and the nature of the house structure.
avri