Thank you, Anne. We will take this up on
our call this coming Tuesday.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
From: Aikman-Scalese,
Anne [mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:43
PM
To: 'Ron Andruff'; 'James M.
Bladel'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford'
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc]
REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March Re-Submitting a Motion
Ron,
I had wanted to report to SCI that in its
full meeting in
Anne
Anne E.
Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@LRLaw.com
• www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing
this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and
confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original
message.
From:
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:49
AM
To: 'James M. Bladel';
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford'
Subject: RE:
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March --
Re-Submitting a Motion
Thank you James and Jennifer for the quick
turnaround on this matter. As I understand it, the request for
re-submitting a motion had never happened before the first occasion, which
brought it to our table, but I agree that it would be for the Committee to
discuss the idea of frequency to make sure we are all of like mind as to what
this would mean.
By way of this mail, I am asking Julie to
be sure to include this in our next meeting.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
From:
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 9:51
PM
To:
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Cc: Jennifer Standiford
Subject: Re:
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March --
Re-Submitting a Motion
Importance: High
Hello SCI Team:
Last week, Jennifer
and I were able to consult with the Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this
issue. We can report that RrSG members strongly favor Option #2.
Additionally,
Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except- for item #2.4,
which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are followed.
Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some limitations
(per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may be
re-introduced.
We look forward to
further discussions on our next call.
Thanks--
J.
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45
To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06
March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
Dear
SCI members,
This
is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion. The action
item is as follows:
--
Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their
Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies.
It is
our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual Property Constituency
and the Registrar Stakeholder Group. All of the other representatives on
the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria.
Best
regards,
Julie
Julie
Hedlund, Policy Director
Possible
Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion:
1.
Leave up to discretion of the Chair
2.
Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):
1)
Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a
motion. Complete no later than the deadline for submitting a motion --
8 days prior to the next GNSO Council meeting.
2)
Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than
the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next
GNSO Council meeting.
3)
Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for
placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda.
4)
Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken
off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the
re-submission.
For more information about
Lewis and Roca LLP,
please go to www.lewisandroca.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This message
is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender
of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance
with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email
contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be
used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties
that may be imposed on the taxpayer.