The slides capture a good summary of our work to date, in my view, Wolf-Ulrich - with one exception.  The second to last slide creates an issue that could, and should be avoided at this time.
 
The question as to whether the SCI should put our work product out to public comment (or send back to GNSO) seems to over-complicate the purpose of a Standing Committee. The SCI role, as I understand it, is to knock off any rough edges of processes that, in practice, expose implementation issues.  Therefore, it is neither NEW policy nor process; rather our work is simply an effort to ensure that all of the gears fit cleanly into the chain that drives ICANN.
 
Until the SCI has discussed this in more detail and taken a decision on the matter there is no reason to bring it up to anyone outside of the SCI, in my view.  For this reason I urge you to remove this slide from the presentation.
 
Thank you for your consideration.
 
Kind regards,
 
RA
 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

 

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

 

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW@telekom.de
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:48 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report

All,
 
attached is the draft report to the council on Saturday morning. Please feel free to comment/amend.
I'd like to send it to Glen by tomorrow 19:00 UTC for posting.
 
Best regards
Wolf-