Thank you, Julie, Wolf-Ulrich,
Having reviewed the motion, it appears to be in order with one caveat; I believe that it is imperative that the GNSO Council come to a final determination on the decision-making
methodology before the motion is introduced. That may well be the intention and your understanding, but I did want to flag that for clarity. No point in voting on a ‘half-baked cake’, as it were.
The SCI looks forward to hearing the outcome of the Council October 31st meeting.
Kind regards,
RA
From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 09:31
To: Ron Andruff; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Charter Revisions
Dear Ron and SCI members,
Wolf-Ulrich has agreed to submit the attached motion for consideration by the Council at its meeting on 31 October for approval of the charter. At its meeting the Council also will discuss the decision-making methodology, so it is possible that the Council may revise the charter prior to its approval. I will update you on 31 October as to the outcome of the discussion, and whether the charter is revised and/or