Anne,

As to your question about the number of days required to put forward a motion, the Council did approve a change to the procedures as follows.  This was approved at the Council meeting on 13 June 2013:

"Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day, 10 calendar days before the GNSO Council meeting."


Best regards,


Julie


Julie Hedlund, Policy Director


From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@lrlaw.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 12:54 PM
To: Mike O'Conner <mike@haven2.com>
Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey

Hi Mikey, I think the term "final review" puts the PDP suspension out of bounds, too.  Anne
 
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete theoriginal message.

 

From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:53 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey

hi Anne,

i think "suspension of a PDP" could be stretched and tugged to just barely fit under the proposed (and current) charter.  i agree that "resubmission of a motion" is out of scope for both our current and proposed charters -- as that is purely a matter of Council rules of procedure.  i think taking that one on is an especially good example of modifying our mission to becoming the "standing GNSO rules committee," which we may want to avoid.

mikey 

PS. i changed the subject line to Mikey -- Mickey is a mouse

On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:37 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:


My view is that neither  the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the "resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the scope of this amended charter as redrafted.  
 
 By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC or something like that.  I am sure staff can clarify.  Anne
 
<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the 
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.


 

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey

All,

For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director


 

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.

Phoenix (602)262-5311    Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090    Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200    Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.












PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

 

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.

Phoenix (602)262-5311    Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090    Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200    Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.