Thank you, Glen.
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
From: Glen de Saint
Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013
1:13 PM
To: Ron Andruff; 'Jonathan
Robinson'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Cc: 'Neuman, Jeff'
Subject: RE:
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task
Dear Jeff,
You have been been
added to the SCI mailing list gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
with public archives at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org
De :
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] De la part de Ron Andruff
Envoyé : mercredi 2 janvier
2013 18:20
À : 'Jonathan Robinson';
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Cc : 'Neuman, Jeff'
Objet : RE:
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task
Dear all,
First, allow me to wish everyone a
healthy, happy and abundant 2013!
Jonathan/Jeff: Thank you for bringing this
matter to the attention of the SCI. To get all of the SCI members up to
speed on what is being discussed, could you kindly provide us with some
background information vis-à-vis what the specific motion was, and what caused
it to come back to the Council in (as I understand it) virtually the same
wording? That will be helpful for our discussion.
Jeff: By way of this email, I am asking
staff (pursuant to the SCI Charter) to add your email address to the discussion
list until this matter has been fully explored and a recommendation has been sent
back to Council.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012
5:50 AM
To: KnobenW@telekom.de; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Cc: 'Neuman, Jeff'
Subject: RE:
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task
All,
Jeff Neuman raised a
point on the GNSO Council list that the question being posed to the SCI should
be a simpler one focussed on the general principle not the specific item that
caused us to question the principle. I am in agreement with this.
Therefore my
suggestion is that the SCI focus on the essential question i.e. under what
circumstances is it acceptable / permissible for a motion to be submitted to
the GNSO Council when such a motion is identical to one that has been
previously voted down by the Council.
Jeff put it well and
I am support of his formulation of the question as follows.
The question should simply be "should there be
any restrictions on resubmitting motions that previously appeared before the
Council? If so, what should those restrictions be and are there any
exceptions?
Thank-you.
Jonathan
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org]
On Behalf Of KnobenW@telekom.de
Sent: 20 December 2012 18:08
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc]
New task
All,
from today's council call the task attached was
shifted to the SCI.
Looking forward to meeting
you later
Wolf-Ulrich