What we have found consensus is as it used to be:
 

Initiate PDP Within Scope

Bylaws:

Art X, ¡×3(9)b

> ¨÷ Both

OR

> ¨ø One

3

AND

5

5

OR

9

Terminate a PDP

(¡°only for a significant cause¡±)

Bylaws:

Art X, ¡×3(9)g

>= ¨ø Both

OR

>= ¨ú One AND > ¨ö One

5

AND

9

6

AND

7

4

AND

10

 
I will include in my presentation the modification suggested by staff and the status of discussion.
 

Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

 

Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 01:09
An: 'Angie Graves'; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Betreff: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report

Thanks Angie. This information was certainly in an earlier draft. In fact, it was part of the change I suggested because I didn't see the language about "only for a significant cause".  Wolf-Ulrich and Marika, was the document sent out for consensus somehow different from the one that we had all previously been working on?
Anne
 
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@LRLaw.com • www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.

 

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Angie Graves
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:40 PM
To: KnobenW@telekom.de
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Council report

Hi All,

For the Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP, I see no content in the presentation.

From Marika, the current thresholds for terminating and initiating a PDP are as follows:
A staff recommendation has been made but has not yet gained consensus in the group.

Best regards,

Angie


On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM, <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:
All,
 
attached is the draft report to the council on Saturday morning. Please feel free to comment/amend.
I'd like to send it to Glen by tomorrow 19:00 UTC for posting.
 
Best regards
Wolf-
 

 

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.

Phoenix (602)262-5311      Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090      Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200      Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.