Maybe you've received this mail on the other mailing list.
 
I was advised that this list (gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org) is the one which should be used for this group. That's why I'm resending the E-Mail attached.
 
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
 


Von: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Februar 2011 16:30
An: ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Betreff: Standing Committee Drafting Team (SC-DT)

All:

 

Please find attached a short summary from the call on Tuesday. As promised a first raw charter draft shall follow before the next call.

 

--------------------------------------- 

 

Participants on the Call, Tuesday, 15 Feb, 13:00 - 14:00 UTC:

Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISCPC

Tatiana Khramtsova -  Registrar Stakeholder Group

Avri Doria - Non Commercial Stakeholder Group 

Philip Sheppard - CBUC 

 

ICANN Staff:

Glen de Saint Gery

Marika Konings

Gisella Gruber-White

Julie Hedlund

 

Absent apologies:

Ray Fassett – Registries Stakeholder Group

Mary Wong - NCUC

Rudi Vanscnick - At–Large

 

 

Agenda and related summary

 

1. Clarifying the DT mandate

 

·         DT should draft a charter for a Standing Committee and present it to the Council for approval. The term “standing” seems appropriate rather than “steering” since underlining the

·         Reactive character of the SC (mainly) with tasks related to subsequent review of improvements that have been implemented from the PPSC and OSC (adopted by the council) and that presents any problems. Shifting the items in question to the new SC after having finished the related document/process by the PPSC/OSC and approved by the council. SC should pick up issues after the group concerned (WG, council etc.) has gained some experience with the process implemented. Periodic (preventive) reviews may also be useful to have.

·         It should be acknowledged that PPSC and OSC still have to finish tasks (maybe on different timescale) whereas the new SC should start working on items already finished (s.a.). Expiry of PPSC/OSC charters in June 2011 is obviously not acceptable.

·         The new SC should do the work by itself, not just identify the issues and “manage” them.

 

2. SC charter draft

 

·         W.-U. Knoben shall come up with a first draft on the basis of this discussion

·         Membership should be of broad participation of all constituencies/SGs. Council members should not be excluded. Call for membership as usual. Open question, whether a council member should chair the new SC. Built in a mechanism to the charter in order that members are being reconfirmed by their respective constituencies/SGs after a certain period.

 

3. Timing

 

·         Present a status report in SF. Motion deadline for SF is Feb 21 which is too early for a draft charter ready to go.

 

4. DT chair

·         Since there was no objection W.-U. Knoben shall continue to chair this Drafting Team

 

5. Next call

 

·         Monday, 12 Feb, 13:00 UTC           

 

Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich