Thank you.
Kind regards,
Julia Charvolen
For GNSO Secretariat
Adobe Connect chat transcript 22 May 2013:
Julia Charvolen:Angie Graves and Ray Fassett have joined the call
Julia Charvolen:Mary Wong and Wolf Ulrich Knoben have joined the call
Julia Charvolen:Jennifer Standiford joined the meeting
Avri Doria:back
Mary Wong:Actually, I wasn't on the Charter Redrafting Subcommittee.
Jennifer Wolfe:I agree with Avri. I apologize I have to leave Adobe Connect, but will continue to be on my cell in my car.
Julie Hedlund:Thanks Jennifer. Noted.
Mary Wong:Me too. I'm particularly struck by the fact that we're not a WG and have a different function.
Bladel:Are we inserting "Full Consensus" or removing it in favor of "Standard WG Rules"
Mary Wong:@James, "full consensus as defined by the WG Rules".
Julie Hedlund:I think Avri was suggesting substituting full consensus for the Standard WG Rules
Avri Doria:no it was becasue we required fgull consensus.
Avri Doria:exactly.
Mike O'Connor:i think she's setting the bar higher
Avri Doria:yes that is what i am sayon this group should only use full consensus.
Mike O'Connor:full consensus per WG rules?
Mike O'Connor:or unanymous?
Avri Doria:yes, it used to be full consensus and that is what i think it should remian.
Julia Charvolen:Please mute your line if you are not speaking
Avri Doria:ful consensus == unanimity
Mary Wong:@Mikey, yes, Full Consensus would have the same meaning as for a WG.
Julie Hedlund:As defined in the WG standard methodology as: Full consensus - when no one in the group speaks against the recommendation in its last readings. This is also sometimes referred to as Unanimous Consensus. Full consensus - when no one in the group speaks against the recommendation in its last readings. This is also sometimes referred to as Unanimous Consensus.
Julie Hedlund:Sorry -- I pasted it twice
Bladel:Full Consensus = No Objections.
Mike O'Connor:ah. thanks
Avri Doria:exactly
Bladel:Kinda how the GAC does business.
Avri Doria:yes
Mike O'Connor:what is our current standard of consensus? full consensus?
Ron A:@ Mikey: Yes, full is our current standard
Avri Doria:i do not approve of the way this meeting is being maniopulated
Mike O'Connor:i agree with Avri on both counts -- full consensus, and follow the queue
Ron A:We have only 8 minutes left in this part and I would like to have a broad discussion of all members
Mike O'Connor:yikes. fell off the call
Mike O'Connor:i'm with Avri. back in a minute
Julia Charvolen:Mike do you wish the operator to dial out to you?
Mike O'Connor:naw -- an elephant stepped on my phone.
Julia Charvolen:Mike is back in
Mike O'Connor:does the IPC have representation on the SCI right now? do we have to wait for that, before acting on anything?
Bladel:Can I request that Staff re=send the two options & the 4 criteria?
Ron A:IPC has 2 reps, but J Scott just resigned. Anne is at her son's grad.
Mike O'Connor:thx
Ron A:IPC had not yet taken their members' temp on this issue
Mike O'Connor:a little closer to the mic should do the trick Ken
Mary Wong:Agree with Mikey.
Mike O'Connor:i'd wait a month -- so we can get Ken's stuff too
Mike O'Connor:which way are we voting w/agree/disagree?
Bladel:Mikey: Agree, going forward monthly, but lets' have one more "reboot" meeting.
Avri Doria:prefer monthly
Mike O'Connor:that's fine. Ken, can you get some of your stuff out in time for that meeting too?
Bladel:close the charter, etc. but the SOP would be monthly after that.
Avri Doria:had sound go out during the'vote'
Mike O'Connor:your sound just dropped again Avri
Avri Doria:never mind.
Avri Doria:ok
Julie Hedlund:The suggestion is two weeks and then to a monthly schedule.
Avri Doria:thanks
Bladel:bingo
Avri Doria:cheers
Mary Wong:Thx Ron, Julie, everyone!
Mike O'Connor:hasty lumbago
Bladel:Thanks.
Angie Graves 2:Thank you
Julie Hedlund:Thank you everyone!
Wolf Knoben:Thank you