New subject: SCI meeting agenda

June 21, 2012

      Actually, my recollection/impression was that when the SCI charter was drafted the phrase was intended to refer to SGs and Cs as well. Can staff or someone with a better memory than I recall one way or the other?

Sent from a mobile device; please excuse brevity and any grammatical or typographical errors.

"Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> wrote:

I think that "a group chartered by the GNSO" must refer to a working group or other team with an adopted GNSO charter.  It does not appear to me on the surface that this phrase refers to a constituency.  I doubt SCI wants to become involved in taking direct requests from constituencies rather than from the GNSO directly or from working groups chartered by the GNSO which are composed of members from more than one constituency and/or stakeholder group.
Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700
One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW@telekom.de
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:10 AM
To: avri@acm.org; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda

I think the initiative through ALAC-Alan (council liaison)-GNSO council would be what is covered by the rules.

Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Avri Doria
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 16:33
An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Betreff: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda

Hi,

Assuming none of the SG/Cs wish to take up the issue as their own (I have not consulted with mine yet), another possibility is that ALAC, using its liaison status with the g-council, bring up the issue of SOI (CoI) with the g-council itself. The g-council could then send the issue to the SCI, ignore it, or find some other approach. Alternatively, ALAC could request an issues report on the subject of SOI/CoI in GNSO policy making etc.

One thing the GNSO should probably avoid, especially during this time of ICANN introspection concerning conflicts of interest, is ignoring the issue.

But I agree we should handle this within the rules established by our charter.

avri

Krista Papac <Krista.Papac@ausregistry.com> wrote:
...
My initial reaction is we should stick with what's in the Charter and
take requests from the GNSO Council or a group chartered by the GNSO
Council.
Krista Papac
General Manager, Policy & Industry Affairs AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Email:
krista.papac@ausregistry.com<mailto:krista.papac@ausregistry.com>
Web: www.ausregistry.com
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of
KnobenW@telekom.de
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 1:55 AM
To: AAikman@lrlaw.com; marika.konings@icann.org; avri@acm.org
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
The charter reads:
<<For items that are submitted for review 'on request', the SCI expects
to receive detailed input from the group affected by the
process/operational change concerned. Such requests can be made by
either the GNSO Council or a group chartered by the GNSO Council.>>
Request from individuals is not included.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juni 2012 18:20
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich;
marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>;
avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>
Cc:
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>
Betreff: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda Does the
charter not define where the issues come from?  I would think it would
have to be limited by the charter.
Anne
[cid:image001.gif@01CD4EB4.19BB2F70]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 One South Church Avenue * Tucson,
Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@LRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com> *
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication was
received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the
original message.
________________________________
From:
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-s
c@icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf
Of KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:18 AM
To: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>;
avri@acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>
Cc:
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>
Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda Personally my
first reaction would be: we should handle it practically and with
flexibility. Don't start amending the rules unless it is imperative.
Flexibility could mean that the SCI
- for a certain period of time (eg 1 year) monitors how many issues are
raised by individuals/groups not covered by the charter. In case it
exceeds a certain volume of requests (depending on the workload) the
SCI may strictly return to the rules as written and not accept further
requests from outside
- for the a.m. period of time the SCI may discuss all issues raised and
make recommendations/suggestions re the issues in scope
- re Evan's SOI related issue I recall - if I'm right - that he was
questioning the sense of some of the points asked for in the SOI. I
think we should first find out whether his issue was more ALAC specific
than relevant to the GNSO
What do others mean?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2012 14:47
An: Avri Doria; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Betreff: FW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda Hi Wolf, Avri,
Under AOB, you might also want to cover the update to the GNSO Council
which is scheduled for Prague. In addition to getting clarification on
who should be responsible for putting out SCI recommendations for
public comments (also of relevance in relation to the item on consensus
items), there is also this issue with regard to who may raise issues
with the SCI. As you may recall, Evan Leibovitch raised a suggestion
with regard to the SOI. There may be other questions / suggestions that
individuals may make in the future relating to GNSO Improvements
topics. However, the SCI charter says 'requests can be made by either
the GNSO Council or a group chartered by the GNSO Council'. Should
individual requests be directed to the GNSO Council for referral, or
should there be another mechanism? It might be good to get
clarification on this as well so it can be made clear to those that
have proposals / questions.
With best regards,
Marika
From: "KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>"
<KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de>>
To:
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
...
...
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda
All:
this is the suggested agenda for the SCI call on Monday June 18, 13:00
UTC:
- Roll call
- Statement of Interests
- Approval of the agenda
- Background information (and suggested solutions) on
       - Deferral of Motions
       - Proxy Voting Procedure
       - Voting Thresholds for Delaying a PDP
- Consensus items: GNSO Council Voting Results Table, Consent Agenda
- AOB: next meeting, F2F in Prague?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311
Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090
Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200
Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by
return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you
that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not
intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer
for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the
taxpayer.
----------------------
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com.

Phoenix (602)262-5311                           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090                            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200                     Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer

RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda

Mary.Wong＠law.unh.edu

Ron Andruff

Avri Doria

KnobenW＠telekom.de

Aikman-Scalese, Anne

tags

participants (5)