All, Here are the actions and notes from today's SCI call. Our next meeting will be in two weeks on 15 November 2012. A meeting notice will ben sent in advance of the meeting. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions: Julie Hedlund: 1) send around the options on Raising an Issue for a last call for comments — provide a 1-week response James Bladel and Jennifer Standiford: Review the draft survey and provide comments by the end of the week. Agenda/Notes: 1. Roll call 2. Statement of Interests — None 3. Approval of the agenda -- Approved 4. Chair and Vice Chair election -- Wolf-Ulrich: Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with what we've done last time: 1. Nomination of candidates from the membership 2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by balloting. Also, we are facing new membership on the SCI because we have new Council members. Asked the new NCAs asking about representation. Jennifer volunteered. I am waiting for responses from others. Also, asked Mary re: the NSUC on the SCI. James: Is there a deadline for selecting the Chair and Vice Chair? Wolf-Ulrich: There is nothing in the charter about new Chairs/Vice Chairs. 5. Deferral of Motions — updated response circulated by J. Scott — This item is deferred to the next meeting since there were only 4 SCI members on the call. 6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a PDP -- Julie Hedlund: Opened 22 Oct/Close 12 Nov. If comments reply period 13 Nov/Close 03 Dec. 7. Raising an issue — Seems to be support for option nr 1: maintain status quo — Wolf-Ulrich: Send again to the SCI members as a last call. Responses in two weeks. 8. Status update on Working Group survey -- Wolf-Ulrich: Number 4 and 5 -- question about scaling -- will we have other categories in the scale? Julie: These could be easily standardized. Wolf-Ulrich — there shouldn't be too many categories in the scale. Ray — Registry SG thought the survey was good in general (not a consensus position). James: Jennifer and I can review by the end of the week. Julie: Staff can create a Zoomerang survey as a trial and the ITRP Part C WG could try it out. James: Registrars and IRTP Part C group could try the survey and they could do it in a week. 9. AOB — None
All, I apologize I could not be on the call - I was called into a last minute emergency meeting at work with no way to notify you all of my absence. I thought I'd also take this opportunity to say that I will be happy to continue to serve on the SCI as a representative of the NCUC even though I am no longer on the Council. From feedback received, this is not viewed as a problem by the NCUC. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Date: 11/1/2012 3:47 PM Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Actions/Notes: SCI Meeting 01 November All, Here are the actions and notes from today's SCI call. Our next meeting will be in two weeks on 15 November 2012. A meeting notice will ben sent in advance of the meeting. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions: Julie Hedlund: 1) send around the options on Raising an Issue for a last call for comments — provide a 1-week response James Bladel and Jennifer Standiford: Review the draft survey and provide comments by the end of the week. Agenda/Notes: 1. Roll call 2. Statement of Interests — None 3. Approval of the agenda -- Approved 4. Chair and Vice Chair election -- Wolf-Ulrich: Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with what we've done last time: 1. Nomination of candidates from the membership 2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by balloting. Also, we are facing new membership on the SCI because we have new Council members. Asked the new NCAs asking about representation. Jennifer volunteered. I am waiting for responses from others. Also, asked Mary re: the NSUC on the SCI. James: Is there a deadline for selecting the Chair and Vice Chair? Wolf-Ulrich: There is nothing in the charter about new Chairs/Vice Chairs. 5. Deferral of Motions — updated response circulated by J. Scott — This item is deferred to the next meeting since there were only 4 SCI members on the call. 6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a PDP -- Julie Hedlund: Opened 22 Oct/Close 12 Nov. If comments reply period 13 Nov/Close 03 Dec. 7. Raising an issue — Seems to be support for option nr 1: maintain status quo — Wolf-Ulrich: Send again to the SCI members as a last call. Responses in two weeks. 8. Status update on Working Group survey -- Wolf-Ulrich: Number 4 and 5 -- question about scaling -- will we have other categories in the scale? Julie: These could be easily standardized. Wolf-Ulrich — there shouldn't be too many categories in the scale. Ray — Registry SG thought the survey was good in general (not a consensus position). James: Jennifer and I can review by the end of the week. Julie: Staff can create a Zoomerang survey as a trial and the ITRP Part C WG could try it out. James: Registrars and IRTP Part C group could try the survey and they could do it in a week. 9. AOB — None
Thanks very much, Mary. I appreciate very much your future work with the SCI. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Gesendet: Freitag, 2. November 2012 04:45 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org; Julie Hedlund Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Actions/Notes: SCI Meeting 01 November All, I apologize I could not be on the call - I was called into a last minute emergency meeting at work with no way to notify you all of my absence. I thought I'd also take this opportunity to say that I will be happy to continue to serve on the SCI as a representative of the NCUC even though I am no longer on the Council. From feedback received, this is not viewed as a problem by the NCUC. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Date: 11/1/2012 3:47 PM Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Actions/Notes: SCI Meeting 01 November All, Here are the actions and notes from today's SCI call. Our next meeting will be in two weeks on 15 November 2012. A meeting notice will ben sent in advance of the meeting. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions: Julie Hedlund: 1) send around the options on Raising an Issue for a last call for comments - provide a 1-week response James Bladel and Jennifer Standiford: Review the draft survey and provide comments by the end of the week. Agenda/Notes: 1. Roll call 2. Statement of Interests - None 3. Approval of the agenda -- Approved 4. Chair and Vice Chair election -- Wolf-Ulrich: Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with what we've done last time: 1. Nomination of candidates from the membership 2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by balloting. Also, we are facing new membership on the SCI because we have new Council members. Asked the new NCAs asking about representation. Jennifer volunteered. I am waiting for responses from others. Also, asked Mary re: the NSUC on the SCI. James: Is there a deadline for selecting the Chair and Vice Chair? Wolf-Ulrich: There is nothing in the charter about new Chairs/Vice Chairs. 5. Deferral of Motions - updated response circulated by J. Scott - This item is deferred to the next meeting since there were only 4 SCI members on the call. 6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a PDP -- Julie Hedlund: Opened 22 Oct/Close 12 Nov. If comments reply period 13 Nov/Close 03 Dec. 7. Raising an issue - Seems to be support for option nr 1: maintain status quo - Wolf-Ulrich: Send again to the SCI members as a last call. Responses in two weeks. 8. Status update on Working Group survey -- Wolf-Ulrich: Number 4 and 5 -- question about scaling -- will we have other categories in the scale? Julie: These could be easily standardized. Wolf-Ulrich - there shouldn't be too many categories in the scale. Ray - Registry SG thought the survey was good in general (not a consensus position). James: Jennifer and I can review by the end of the week. Julie: Staff can create a Zoomerang survey as a trial and the ITRP Part C WG could try it out. James: Registrars and IRTP Part C group could try the survey and they could do it in a week. 9. AOB - None
Thanks very much, Julie. All, since we had limited participation in the call - which I was aware in advance having received the apologies - we decided not to step forward in particular with the topics where decisions are due (chair and VC election, deferral of motions). I'd like to ask everybody in the team to react on the open action items until the next meeting scheduled for 15 Nov. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 20:47 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Actions/Notes: SCI Meeting 01 November All, Here are the actions and notes from today's SCI call. Our next meeting will be in two weeks on 15 November 2012. A meeting notice will ben sent in advance of the meeting. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions: Julie Hedlund: 1) send around the options on Raising an Issue for a last call for comments - provide a 1-week response James Bladel and Jennifer Standiford: Review the draft survey and provide comments by the end of the week. Agenda/Notes: 1. Roll call 2. Statement of Interests - None 3. Approval of the agenda -- Approved 4. Chair and Vice Chair election -- Wolf-Ulrich: Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with what we've done last time: 1. Nomination of candidates from the membership 2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by balloting. Also, we are facing new membership on the SCI because we have new Council members. Asked the new NCAs asking about representation. Jennifer volunteered. I am waiting for responses from others. Also, asked Mary re: the NSUC on the SCI. James: Is there a deadline for selecting the Chair and Vice Chair? Wolf-Ulrich: There is nothing in the charter about new Chairs/Vice Chairs. 5. Deferral of Motions - updated response circulated by J. Scott - This item is deferred to the next meeting since there were only 4 SCI members on the call. 6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a PDP -- Julie Hedlund: Opened 22 Oct/Close 12 Nov. If comments reply period 13 Nov/Close 03 Dec. 7. Raising an issue - Seems to be support for option nr 1: maintain status quo - Wolf-Ulrich: Send again to the SCI members as a last call. Responses in two weeks. 8. Status update on Working Group survey -- Wolf-Ulrich: Number 4 and 5 -- question about scaling -- will we have other categories in the scale? Julie: These could be easily standardized. Wolf-Ulrich - there shouldn't be too many categories in the scale. Ray - Registry SG thought the survey was good in general (not a consensus position). James: Jennifer and I can review by the end of the week. Julie: Staff can create a Zoomerang survey as a trial and the ITRP Part C WG could try it out. James: Registrars and IRTP Part C group could try the survey and they could do it in a week. 9. AOB - None
On 1 Nov 2012, at 15:47, Julie Hedlund wrote:
Also, asked Mary re: the NSUC on the SCI.
I beleive that the NCSG and NCUC have renewed Mary and me as SCI representatives NCSG: Avri: primary Mary: Secondary NCUC: Mary: primary Avri: Secondary I have copied the chairs of NCSG and NCUC for confirmation. avri
Thanks. So there is just the NCA seat filling to conclude: Jennifer or Thomas. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Avri Doria Gesendet: Montag, 12. November 2012 23:23 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Cc: Robin Gross; David Cake Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Actions/Notes: SCI Meeting 01 November On 1 Nov 2012, at 15:47, Julie Hedlund wrote:
Also, asked Mary re: the NSUC on the SCI.
I beleive that the NCSG and NCUC have renewed Mary and me as SCI representatives NCSG: Avri: primary Mary: Secondary NCUC: Mary: primary Avri: Secondary I have copied the chairs of NCSG and NCUC for confirmation. avri
participants (4)
-
Avri Doria -
Julie Hedlund -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Mary.Wong＠law.unh.edu