Saturday before 10 am sounds good for me. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 03:38:12 -0800 From: jscottevans@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity To: Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Happy to meet before 10 AM Saturday. From: Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>; To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>; Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Sent: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 11:35:03 PM The GNSO sessions start at 10 a.m. Armed with some good, strong Costa Rican coffee, I think I can handle meeting F2F before that ... :) I wonder if anyone will ask the SCI to look at the "improved" bicameral House and Stakeholder Group/Constituency structure and see if it's working .... (yikes!) Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrlaw.com> To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@acm.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Date: 3/5/2012 6:31 PM Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman@LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, <KnobenW@telekom.de> <KnobenW@telekom.de> wrote:

What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this.

Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. avri ---------------------- For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer