I am planning on dialing in which I believe is 2am my time. Lori S. Schulman Senior Director, Internet Policy INTA 202-261-6588 ________________________________ From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> Sent: ‎3/‎4/‎2016 12:02 PM To: 'Julie Hedlund'<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>; 'Amr Elsadr'<mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org> Cc: Rudi Vansnick<mailto:rudi.vansnick@isoc.be>; Mary Wong<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>; Marika Konings<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>; gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>; Lori Schulman<mailto:lschulman@inta.org>; gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council Thanks Julie. Unfortunately due to the time zone difference, I will not be able to attend the SCI meetings and the SCI update to GNSO Council remotely. Since being out with bronchitis, it is important for me to get good sleep. I am unsure as to whether Lori plans to participate remotely on behalf of IPC but she is copied here. I know the meetings are in good hands with Rudi. Will miss seeing all of you in Marrakech and hope to join again in the June meeting. Thank you all for your hard work. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _______________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:10 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Amr Elsadr' Cc: Rudi Vansnick; Mary Wong; Marika Konings; gnso-secs@icann.org Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council All, Here are the final slides with the change suggested by Anne and confirmed by Amr. Thanks! Julie On 3/2/16, 3:17 PM, "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@icann.org> wrote:

Dear Amr,

I am very sorry that we missed you as a volunteer for the sub teams. I don’t know how that happened.

Earlier today I submitted on behalf of the two sub teams the reports to the SCI — did you see them? I will send them directly to you too.

Kind regards, Julie

On 3/2/16, 3:10 PM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:

...

Hi Amr. Sorry you did not get added. Subteam B definitely has materials to submit for full SCI discussion on Saturday and I know Julie plans to forward this as we have been finalizing the language and topics for discussion. Wolf-Ulrich took a leadership role in developing our Subteam B work thus far. Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _______________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:04 PM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: Julie Hedlund; Rudi Vansnick; Mary Wong; Marika Konings Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council

Hi,

I believe Anne is correct with regards to the order of consensus call followed by the public comment period. I don’t recall any SCI recommendations being subject to public comment in the absence of full consensus of the committee members. Now that I think about it, from a process perspective, that is rather unfortunate, since it robs the members of the SCI from taking public comments submitted into consideration before the consensus call is made.

On the other hand, I don’t recall anyone ever submitting a comment on SCI recommendations, so the point may be practically moot.

On another topic…, I was looking at the GNSO calendar a few days ago and noticed a few SCI sub-team meetings that took place. I thought I had volunteered for both of those (A & B) on one of our calls, but I may be wrong. I looked into it, and did notice that my name wasn’t on the list of sub-team members that was circulated on the SCI email list. Since I failed to respond, I suppose I have nobody to blame but myself.

Are there any plans to provide an update to the full committee on progress made on those sub-teams? Is that what we will be discussing on Saturday morning? Perhaps some material shared in advance of Saturday may make the meeting a little more constructive?

Thanks.

Amr

...

On Mar 2, 2016, at 9:34 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:

Thanks Julie. I think the Consensus Call within SCI comes BEFORE putting recommendations out for public comment

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman@lrrc.com

_____________________________

<image004.png> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com

From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:58 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Rudi Vansnick Cc: Amr Elsadr; Mary Wong; Marika Konings Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council

Thanks so much Anne, that’s a very helpful point. I’ve updated the slides accordingly and attached them.

Kind regards,

Julie

From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 1:45 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@isoc.be> Cc: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council

Julie – with regard to Next Steps, I think we have to note that the Consensus Call within SCI is required in each case.

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman@lrrc.com

_____________________________

<image003.png> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com

From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:40 AM To: Rudi Vansnick; Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: Amr Elsadr; Mary Wong; Marika Konings Subject: FOR REVIEW: Slides for SCI Update to the GNSO Council Importance: High

Dear Rudi and Anne,

Mary and I have drafted for your review the attached slides for the SCI update to the GNSO Council on copy since as GNSO Council Liaison to the SCI.

Note that I have attached the slides in both PowerPoint and PDF. You may find that if you don’t have view the PDF.

Kind regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the §2510-2521.

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.