<map version="0.9.0">
<!-- To view this file, download free mind mapping software FreeMind from http://freemind.sourceforge.net -->
<node CREATED="1379411112580" ID="ID_413664280" MODIFIED="1379414247607" TEXT="Registrant Claimant initiated TDRP">
<node CREATED="1379414219349" ID="ID_1133503009" MODIFIED="1379660943914" POSITION="left" TEXT="Initial Questions">
<node CREATED="1379412607151" ID="ID_1119641532" MODIFIED="1379601525486" TEXT="What are the conditions under which the Reigstrant Claimant can launch a TDRP with a Dispute Provide?"/>
<node CREATED="1379413347928" ID="ID_1123824549" MODIFIED="1379413383141" TEXT="Can the (losing) Registrar still launch a TDRP with the Registry and/or the second level Dispute Resolution Provider?"/>
<node CREATED="1379413165751" ID="ID_889287587" MODIFIED="1379413342042" TEXT="What is the role of the Registry?"/>
<node CREATED="1379411474268" ID="ID_1378671444" MODIFIED="1379601569687" TEXT="What is the role of the Registrar which whom the Registrant Claimant (RC) had registered the domain initially?"/>
<node CREATED="1379413549969" ID="ID_1170955998" MODIFIED="1379413590057" TEXT="What information does the Dipute Resolution Provider need from the Registant Claimant to launch a TDRP?"/>
<node CREATED="1379660943915" ID="ID_1536960814" MODIFIED="1379660977017" TEXT="I light of Charter Question A (reporting requirements): Which step (across) should be published and by whom? "/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379414248591" ID="ID_1752882965" MODIFIED="1379661265014" POSITION="right" TEXT="Proposed Steps">
<node CREATED="1379416775020" ID="ID_1079887443" MODIFIED="1379660986764" TEXT="Step 1: Registrant Complainant (RC) contacts &quot;original&quot; Registrar">
<node CREATED="1379660463308" ID="ID_68404802" MODIFIED="1379660519194" TEXT="Question: What kind of information/documentation is required here? Should this be detailed? Or should the policy just stipulate that that all documentation necessary/available to prove RC&quot;s claim?"/>
<node CREATED="1379660986764" ID="ID_1397087961" MODIFIED="1379661048748" TEXT="Related to Charter Questions A: Should the REgistrar be encouraged/obliged to Report on the numbers of RC &apos;contacts&apos; and/or the outcome of those outcomes?"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379416857833" ID="ID_66045061" MODIFIED="1379660603340" TEXT="Step 2: &quot;Original&quot; Registrar proceeds to contact Registrar of Record and tries to find a solution ">
<node CREATED="1379417136214" ID="ID_688926133" MODIFIED="1379417153788" TEXT="If an amicable solition is found the process ends"/>
<node CREATED="1379660522439" ID="ID_510454223" MODIFIED="1379660562166" TEXT="Questions: Is there a &apos;threshold&apos; which, when crossed, means that the &apos;orginial&apos; Registrar is obliged to contact the current Registar of Record?"/>
<node CREATED="1379660563362" ID="ID_1871070154" MODIFIED="1379660601134" TEXT="Should the communication of the two Registrars be more regulated or is it enough to encoruage them to come to a solution?"/>
<node CREATED="1379660603340" ID="ID_712602468" MODIFIED="1379681591016" TEXT="Can the &apos;orginal&apos; Registrar still launch a TDRP and so, will this just be according to the existing policy? Or should the Registry level be abandoned and the Registrar would have to go to a DRP?"/>
<node CREATED="1379661050889" ID="ID_356017958" MODIFIED="1379661081884" TEXT="In light of Charter Question a): If an amicable sotluion is found - what information should be reported and by whom?"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379417154848" ID="ID_1521807634" MODIFIED="1379661089434" TEXT="Step 3a: &quot;Original&quot; Registrar acknolwedges that the RC used to be a legitimate Registred Domain Holder and RC can proceed to Dispute Resolution Provider">
<node CREATED="1379417219014" ID="ID_152908058" MODIFIED="1379601705743" TEXT="Question: Is such a Registrar &apos;authentification&apos; necessary? Presumably the DRP will contact relevant Registrars and consult WHOIS records in any case."/>
<node CREATED="1379660676237" ID="ID_1168900723" MODIFIED="1379660700638" TEXT="If no such acknowledgement is made, does this prevent the RC to proceed to a DRP?"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379417268119" ID="ID_1379710169" MODIFIED="1379661103375" TEXT="Step 3b: &quot;Original&quot; Registrar has no record of RC and does not proceed with the complaint - but he communicates reasons and lack of records tp RC">
<node CREATED="1379601837971" ID="ID_634977141" MODIFIED="1379601868627" TEXT="Question: Can the RC then still proceed with a TDRP via the DRP?"/>
<node CREATED="1379661104398" ID="ID_1052687606" MODIFIED="1379661125808" TEXT="in light of Charter Question a): Does the &apos;original&apos; Registrar have to report this activity?"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379417301425" ID="ID_945904619" MODIFIED="1379603075899" TEXT="Step 4: RC Contacts  DRP and provides all documenation at hand to prove claim over the contested domain.">
<node CREATED="1379603086771" ID="ID_1553554222" MODIFIED="1379603158762" TEXT="Question: Can the RC contact launch a TDRP even if the &quot;Original&quot; Registrar did not have any record of the RC? If so: is there any minimum requirement of documentation? Or is it up to the DRP to gather evidence (see step 5)?"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379417317339" ID="ID_1157830508" MODIFIED="1379660838832" TEXT="Step 5: DRP is free to contact any or all of the following &quot;Original&quot; Registrar, current Registrar of Records, current DNH, ICANN to  gather facts necessary to establish the standign of the RC as well as other evidence necessary to establish  possible breaches  of the IRTP">
<node CREATED="1379602439769" ID="ID_114746898" MODIFIED="1379602464458" TEXT="Question: Should the policy specify what the DRP should request? Or should the policy leave the decision on what evidence is needed to the DRP?"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379601719623" ID="ID_1643679984" MODIFIED="1379602542478" TEXT="Step 6: DRP forms a Panel to weigh the ecidence and made a ruling that either reverses the transfer and transfers the domain name back to the RC or confirms the status quo">
<node CREATED="1379602480969" ID="ID_732111702" MODIFIED="1379681585232" TEXT="In its decision the DRP should explain how it has reached its decision and what evidence and data it was able to obtain and use in its deliberations."/>
<node CREATED="1379602545171" ID="ID_751152411" MODIFIED="1379602546894" TEXT="Question: Can the outcome be appealed with another/same DRP?"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1379601942570" ID="ID_611767595" MODIFIED="1379602205583" TEXT="Step 7: Any party can seeks remedy against the Panel decision in a court of law of jurisdictional competence"/>
</node>
</node>
</map>
