Kevin R Erdman
Reichel IP LLP
212 West 10th Street, Suite D-280
Indianapolis, IN 46202
voice 317.677.0689
fax 317.454.1349
skype kevimundo
web www.reichelip.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 15:23 PM
To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org>, "gnso-irtpd@icann.org" <gnso-irtpd@icann.org>
Subject: RE: TDRP stats
Lars,
Thank
you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers
disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for
each case, there is a “winning” registrar and a “losing registrar”.
Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be
divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties
to the case and neither prevailed. Hope this helps to explain the numbers
a bit. Thank you.
|
| |
|
Barbara
Knight |
<!--[if !vml]--> |
From: owner-gnso-irtpd@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01
AM
To: gnso-irtpd@icann.org
Subject:
[gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats
And
just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet
…
Apologies,
Lars
From:
Lars
Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org>
Date:
Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM
To: "gnso-irtpd@icann.org" <gnso-irtpd@icann.org>
Subject:
TDRP stats
Dear
all,
In
light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with
transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive.
We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the
relevant information.
In
addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to
the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the
TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs
per month – both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March
2013.
You
might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same
each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent
the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a
working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further.
Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows
that:
of 227
total cases between October 2009 and March 2013
224
concerned .com (94.3%)
11
concerned .net (4.8%)
2
concerned .pro (0.9%)
For
those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly
Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports
With
best wishes from rainy Brussels,
Lars