hi all, Thomas sent me this comment after the IRTP-D update during the weekend Council meeting. Lars, could you include this in the comments-received pile? we may want to circle back to Thomas and learn some more about his rationale. thanks, mikey On Mar 22, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
Hi Mikey, can you please record my comment that I think it makes sense not to have the limitation extended from 6 to 12 months, but to e.g. 15 months to cover the issue of hijacked domain names with unaltered DNS.
Thanks, Thomas
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
Done On 24/03/14 09:17, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@haven2.com> wrote:
hi all,
Thomas sent me this comment after the IRTP-D update during the weekend Council meeting. Lars, could you include this in the comments-received pile? we may want to circle back to Thomas and learn some more about his rationale.
thanks,
mikey
On Mar 22, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
Hi Mikey, can you please record my comment that I think it makes sense not to have the limitation extended from 6 to 12 months, but to e.g. 15 months to cover the issue of hijacked domain names with unaltered DNS.
Thanks, Thomas
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
participants (2)
-
Lars Hoffmann -
Mike O'Connor