Dear All, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group meeting will be held 21 July 2014. Please find the MP3 recording for the IRTP Part D Working Group call held on Monday 14 July 2014 at 15:00 UTC at: <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-irtp-d-20140714-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-irtp-d-20140714-en.mp3 On page: <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jul> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jul The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Barbara Knight – RySG James Bladel - RrSG Kristine Dorrian – National Arbitration Forum Graeme Bunton – RrSG Angie Graves – BC Holly Raiche – ALAC Volker Greimann – RrSG Rob Golding - RrSG Kevin Erdman – IPC Avri Doria – NCSG Bob Mountain – RrSG Arthur Zonnenberg – RrSG Chris Chaplow – CBUC Apologies: Paul Diaz – RySG ICANN staff: Marika Konings Lars Hoffmann Berry Cobb Steve Chan Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ Wiki page: <https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg> https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Connect chat transcript for Monday 14 July 2014: Lars Hoffmann:Welcome to the IRTP Part D PDP WG, Monday 14 July 2014 Terri Agnew:Welcome Arthur Zonnenberg Terri Agnew:Kevin Erdman and Bob Mounatin has joined Terri Agnew:Avri Doria has joined Arthur Zonnenberg:hi terri and group. Barbara Knight:I would support a go forward process for this requirement as well. Holly Raiche:Only going forward was my assumption Arthur Zonnenberg:I sent an email to the mailing list with feedback on the current final report as well as responses to comments made last week Avri Doria:While i can see the history being useful, the work required seem sunproportionate to the value. I agree going forward is sufficinet. Arthur Zonnenberg:go ahead on charter questions A and B Terri Agnew:As a reminder, on telephone you can press *6 to mute or *6 to unmute Graeme Bunton:you're very quiet kevin Volker Greimann:kevin, I cannot hear a word Holly Raiche:I like the term 'immediately prior' as clearer Arthur Zonnenberg:agreement with James that that would be less ambiguous than originaliteit Arthur Zonnenberg:(Apple chargés all my text...) Graeme Bunton:duplicative! Graeme Bunton:(not saying it is, enjoying the word) Arthur Zonnenberg:THE current irtp already requires locking or THE udrp does Arthur Zonnenberg:agree to include lock Marika Konings:It is currently out for public comment, if I am not mistaken. Marika Konings:the implementation plan, that is... Marika Konings:It closes on 18 July (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/udrp-rules-proposed-2014-05-19-en) Marika Konings:"The current plan is to announce implementation in November or December with a six-month implementation deadline." Marika Konings::-) Terri Agnew:Chris Chaplow has joined Chris Chaplow:thanks, awaiting dial in operator now Terri Agnew:Hi Chris, I see you have joined audio Chris Chaplow:yes all fine, thanks, apologies for v late Terri Agnew:Rob Golding has joined Arthur Zonnenberg:is an official disputen resolution provider necessary for a non legal domain procedure? Arthur Zonnenberg:holly even if you clarify it they are unlikely to pay the fee.. Holly Raiche:.I undestand that. The purpose of more clarity is to at least let the registrant know when they can approach ICANN and when not Arthur Zonnenberg:agree holly :) Holly Raiche:In the London meeting we did discuss hat we need to at least review te implication of costs Holly Raiche:Barbara's point was taken into account in London - it actually costs! Arthur Zonnenberg:I think the drp should be a second option not a frist Arthur Zonnenberg:first Kristine Dorrain-NAF:Fair point...you're saying that the DRP is not the only option under the enhanced IRTP and compliance role.? Berry Cobb:There is a 1st level, yes? The Rt working with their respective Rr to resolve the issue, prior to any TDRP being initiatied? Arthur Zonnenberg:must agree with James, but then registrar outreach must be informed to rnh more clearly Arthur Zonnenberg:Kristine yes give the first verdict to icann compliance Arthur Zonnenberg:then rnh can always pay more for tdrp or court Kristine Dorrain-NAF:Aurthur, to be clear compliance doesn't have an official TDRP function. Arthur Zonnenberg:Kristine I know but often that is not required. rnh just wants their domain back. compliance could be given such official function if necessary I think Arthur Zonnenberg:icann is not the registrars nor registrars and can definitely policy registrars :) Arthur Zonnenberg:thans Lets continue next week Rob Golding (Astutium-1471):thanks james