Dear all,

Many questions about our scope were made clear in the call, but not
all. Notably, the limitation to a maximum of two strings was implied
(see slide 21) but not explicitly decided as far as I could tell.

It sounds like a strange limitation to me, given that there are
cases where more than two words, even proper names, differ only
in having different diacritics. My earlier examples included ø
which was declared out of scope, but there're similar cases
with "real" diacritics, e.g., Sjoberg, Sjöberg and Sjóberg.

Can we consider cases where someone applies for three or
more such at the same time, or where one already has two
of them and applies for a third one &c?

--
Tapani Tarvainen
_______________________________________________
Gnso-latin-diacritics mailing list -- gnso-latin-diacritics@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-latin-diacritics-leave@icann.org